Both the Whiskey Rebellion of 1794 and the Nullification Crisis of 1832-1833 arose from resistance to what was perceived as overreach by the federal government. The Whiskey Rebellion was a response to a federal excise tax on whiskey, which farmers viewed as unfairly targeting their livelihoods, while the Nullification Crisis stemmed from Southern states’ opposition to federal tariffs they believed harmed their economies. In both cases, local populations sought to assert their rights and autonomy against a central authority they felt was infringing upon their freedoms and interests. These events reflect a persistent tension in American history between state sovereignty and federal power.
no
He encouraged the government to get stronger.
Shays rebellion showed leaders of America that the articles of confederation were too weak, and a strong national government was needed
The Nullification Crisis
Washington was able to stop the rebellion with troops. This was not the case during Shay's Rebellion. The stopping of the rebellion showed the people that the army was strong and the new government could enforce laws.
The national government
After Shay's rebellion many Americans wanted a stronger national government. Shay's rebellion was an uprising that took place in 1786.
Shay's Rebellion
Shay's Rebellion
Military army
He encouraged the government to get stronger.
no
Shays rebellion showed leaders of America that the articles of confederation were too weak, and a strong national government was needed
They could offer little help to Massachusetts.
SUCKER...... i want to know too
the united states did not have enough arsenals
The Nullification Crisis