The fear of radicals and foreigners during the Sacco and Vanzetti trial significantly influenced public perception and the judicial process. The defendants, both Italian immigrants and anarchists, were viewed with suspicion in the context of post-World War I America, which was marked by rising nativism and anti-immigrant sentiment. This bias led to a lack of a fair trial, with the prosecution focusing on their political beliefs rather than the evidence, ultimately resulting in their conviction despite doubts about their guilt. The case became emblematic of the era's xenophobia and the broader struggle for justice and civil rights.
Sorry, no
by using battleships
It didnt really affect the war that much. the attack was to small to affect it very much.
Yes
It affected the war by giving advantage to the North.
sacco and vanzetti supported anarchism but didnt hate america. they were convicted because of their anarchist beliefs which goes against their constitutional rights.
How did the outcome of the scope trial affect the teaching of science in school?
No it doesn't effect the outcome of the result.
Yes
Dependent event :)
Yes.
No. The fact that the outcome of one trial does not affect the outcome of any other trial follows from the fact that the trials that are independent. Whether the distribution is binomial or not is totally irrelevant.
no it does not affect the outcome
By not affecting it in any way. The manufacture of electronic devices might affect the ozone layer, if that manufacture releases free radicals or freon (chloroflurocarbons) into the atmosphere ... free radicals destroy ozone. However, electronics themselves have no impact on the ozone layer.
Free radicals can damage skin cells, leading to premature aging, wrinkles, and other skin issues. They can also contribute to skin conditions like acne and inflammation. Using antioxidants can help neutralize free radicals and protect the skin.
The result can be erroneous.
Expiramental variable