0
What else can I help you with?
What led the turmoil of the roman empire in the 3rd century?
Due to a few factors, lack of control. The government couldn't control the 500k strong military. Lack of money, lots of citizens were rioting. Lack of political stability, Rome's political system was inefficient and also they couldn't keep control of their empire overall.
Which culture showed the least tolerance for the rights of other peoples within its empire?
The Roman Empire is often cited as a culture that showed the least tolerance for the rights of other peoples within its empire. Roman expansion was characterized by the imposition of Roman laws, language, and customs on conquered territories, often leading to the suppression of local cultures and traditions. The Roman practice of enslaving conquered peoples and the harsh treatment of those who resisted Roman rule further demonstrate the lack of tolerance for the rights of others within the empire.
What were the weaknesses that led to the fall of the roman empire?
The fall of the Roman Empire usually refers to the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire in the 5th century. The eastern part of the Roman Empire continued to exist for nearly 1,000 years. The fall of this part of the empire was precipitated by the invasions of the Germanic peoples. The weaknesses of the Romans were lack of unity and reliance of allied Germanic troops. There were in-fights between the Romans which made a concerted response to the invasions difficult. Moreover, Germanic soldiers who had risen through the ranks were made commanders-in-chiefs of the Roman army in the west and who seized effective power.
What three aspects of Roman civilization did the fall Rome involve?
The wide spread of the Roman Empire and the lack of military at it's borders. The Emperors weren't as good leaders as before. The Capital was moved away.
Why didnt the Roman Empire reunite?
The Roman Empire did not reunite primarily due to political fragmentation, cultural differences, and external pressures. After its division in 285 AD into the Western and Eastern Roman Empires, the Western Empire faced invasions from various barbarian tribes, leading to its collapse in 476 AD. Meanwhile, the Eastern Empire, or Byzantine Empire, continued to thrive but evolved its own distinct identity and governance. Additionally, the lack of a strong unifying leadership and differing economic conditions further entrenched the divide between the two regions.
How did the lack of new conquest hurt the empire?
Made it so the Romans fought together, some of the military left because they were tired of doing nothing, and this helped other towns get stronger and defeat Rome.
Western Roman Empire Fell?
it found its self spred out to thin militarily, economicly,and the lack of strong leaders
How did the Byzantine develop their own civilization?
When the empire split, Byzantine became its own entity. Over the years, the fall of the other half of the Roman Empire, it began to form its own culture in part because of the lack of Roman influence and abundance of Greek culture in the empire.
What were the cause of disruption of trade that led to the fall of the roman empire?
The western part of the Roman Empire fell under the strain of the invasions by the Germanic peoples, which was compounded by lack of internal unity, infighting and usurpations which rendered the Roman response to the invasions ineffective
What role did the size of the Roman Empire have in its' eventual breakdown?
The Roman empire became so big that it became difficult to defend from both continuous on and off wars with the Persians and from pressures by peoples who leaved north of it in Europe.However, this in a relative factor. Lack of political cohesion made the western part of the Roman Empire unable to respond to the invasions by the Germanic peoples effectively. The eastern part of the Roman Empire was not affected by these invasions and continued to exist for nearly 1,000 years.
What wreaked the Roman army?
Basically the Roman army was weakened by inaction which led to lack of discipline.Basically the Roman army was weakened by inaction which led to lack of discipline.Basically the Roman army was weakened by inaction which led to lack of discipline.Basically the Roman army was weakened by inaction which led to lack of discipline.Basically the Roman army was weakened by inaction which led to lack of discipline.Basically the Roman army was weakened by inaction which led to lack of discipline.Basically the Roman army was weakened by inaction which led to lack of discipline.Basically the Roman army was weakened by inaction which led to lack of discipline.Basically the Roman army was weakened by inaction which led to lack of discipline.
What led the turmoil of the roman empire in the 3rd century?
Due to a few factors, lack of control. The government couldn't control the 500k strong military. Lack of money, lots of citizens were rioting. Lack of political stability, Rome's political system was inefficient and also they couldn't keep control of their empire overall.
How were medieval Europe and the roman empire different?
The Roman Empire was pretty advanced in government, services to the citizens, protection of the empire, building, and schools. In contrast, the middle ages was chaos. There was a lack of government, services, and advancement of any sort. People could no longer read or write, science was considered bad, and there was no protection offered by the government. Without the structure of the Roman Empire Europe fell into the "dark ages" for a 1000 years.
Which culture showed the least tolerance for the rights of other peoples within its empire?
The Roman Empire is often cited as a culture that showed the least tolerance for the rights of other peoples within its empire. Roman expansion was characterized by the imposition of Roman laws, language, and customs on conquered territories, often leading to the suppression of local cultures and traditions. The Roman practice of enslaving conquered peoples and the harsh treatment of those who resisted Roman rule further demonstrate the lack of tolerance for the rights of others within the empire.
What were the weaknesses that led to the fall of the roman empire?
The fall of the Roman Empire usually refers to the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire in the 5th century. The eastern part of the Roman Empire continued to exist for nearly 1,000 years. The fall of this part of the empire was precipitated by the invasions of the Germanic peoples. The weaknesses of the Romans were lack of unity and reliance of allied Germanic troops. There were in-fights between the Romans which made a concerted response to the invasions difficult. Moreover, Germanic soldiers who had risen through the ranks were made commanders-in-chiefs of the Roman army in the west and who seized effective power.
What three aspects of Roman civilization did the fall Rome involve?
The wide spread of the Roman Empire and the lack of military at it's borders. The Emperors weren't as good leaders as before. The Capital was moved away.
Why didnt the Roman Empire reunite?
The Roman Empire did not reunite primarily due to political fragmentation, cultural differences, and external pressures. After its division in 285 AD into the Western and Eastern Roman Empires, the Western Empire faced invasions from various barbarian tribes, leading to its collapse in 476 AD. Meanwhile, the Eastern Empire, or Byzantine Empire, continued to thrive but evolved its own distinct identity and governance. Additionally, the lack of a strong unifying leadership and differing economic conditions further entrenched the divide between the two regions.
