answersLogoWhite

0

briefly, yes it did very much effect the Ottoman Empire and became one of the major reasons for its downfall....

____________________________________________________________

Although the Ottoman Empire is now generally thought of as being a Turkish Empire, the Ottomans identified themselves by language and religion more than by an ethnic identity. Although the Turks made up the largest portion of the population and had been the ones to establish the Empire, they had recognized early on that they would have to assimilate the subject populations and make use of their talents. Many of the most able managers and administrators of the empire were Greek, the merchants and traders were often Armenian, and for centuries the soldiers in its armies and the governors of whole provinces were raised from Christian children captured in the Balkans and raised in the Sultan's palace. The famous Grand Vizier Mehmet Sokollu Pasha was the son of Bosnian parents, and the Sultans themselves were frequently from non-Turkish mothers. All these people thought of themselves as "Ottomans" and most spoke Turkish.

In the 19th century, waves of nationalism swept Europe, with people who had always been the vassals of larger nations or who were part of cobbled together territories began to wish for countries of their own. For example, the people of the many cities and small kingdoms of Italy began to think of themselves as a single people "Italy" and began to think of "Italy" as a country instead of just a geographical expression. This led to the unification of some countries, like Italy or Germany, but caused great conflicts in others, such as the Austro-Hungarian and Ottoman Empires.

The Ottomans had never tried to forcibly convert any population to Islam or force any group to give up their language, so in some areas like Arabia and the Balkans there were large groups of subject people who had a different language and faith than their rulers. In some cases, like Serbia and Greece, the people had memories of independent kingdoms from before the Empire. As nationalist passion began to grow, it was encouraged by outside powers like Russia, Germany, and England who sought to unbalance the Empire.

The effects were disastrous for the Ottomans; in the Balkans countries declared and fought for independence and then fought each other over the borders. In trying to hold onto Macedonia the Ottoman inadvertently created the first modern terrorists, the IMRO, and were drawn into bloody and inconclusive battles and became demonized in the Western Press as "bloodthirsty Turks".

The worst situation, however, was in areas of the Ottoman heartland where Turks and other nations lived mixed together. A town which had once been 100% Ottoman and peaceful suddenly found itself a warring camp full of Armenian, Kurdish, Greek, and Arabic people. As it found itself pulled into WWI, the Ottomans were faced with movements among the Arabs, Kurds, and Armenians demanding independence or greater freedom and representation within the Empire.

During this period, the Ottomans committed a genocide against the Armenian people which tarnished the name of the Empire in the eyes of the world and history and still haunts the modern Turkish republic. Although the subject is still extremely controversial in Turkey and the use of the word "genocide" is forbidden by law, the facts are not in dispute by most scholars. The Armenians, an ancient Christian people who had lived in Asia Minor and the Caucasus for millenia, and who were found everywhere in the Empire (often as loyal servants of the Empire), were expelled from their homeland or murdered. Some modern Turkish scholars claim that the Armenian genocide was not intended, but that the Ottoman authorities had simply meant to resettle a population they believed was attempting to help the enemy during war and that the massive deaths were a result of either poor planning, unreliable soldiers, or Armenian resistance. Whether or not this is true, a crime of epic proportions took place.

A less atrocious but equally tragic population transfer took place after the war, when Greece and Turkey struck a devil's bargain to make their countries mono-ethnic, mono-linguistic modern nations. Millions of people were displaced as Turks from Greece (who might never have seen Turkey or spoken a word of Turkish) and Greeks from Turkey (whose ancestors had lived on the Anatolian Coast since pre-History) were forced to change places, leaving homes they had had for generations to go live among strangers. By this time the Ottoman Empire was dead, and the whittled down new country of Turkey, under the democratic and secular leader Ataturk, had just driven out a Greek army intent on annexing the entire extent of the old Byzantine Empire.

The new Turkey was modeled on the successful Western democracies, which meant that it was a secular republic with one language and one nationality. In the end, the Turks themselves had given in to nationalism, although Ataturk famously said that "anyone who speaks Turkish and calls himself a Turk is a Turk". This was much more tolerant than the national creeds in many countries, but even today Turkey has not managed to deal with the vexed issue of the people in its borders who do not want to speak Turkish or call themselves Turks. In the case of the Kurds, the largest ethnic group on earth without its own country, the problem of nationalism is still unsolved.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about General History

Why does nationalism explain the split between the Turks and the Arabs within the ottoman empire?

Nationalism fueled the split between Turks and Arabs in the Ottoman Empire as both groups sought self-determination and cultural identity. While Turkish nationalism promoted the dominance of the Turkish language and culture, Arab nationalism emerged in response, advocating for Arab identity and independence. The decline of the empire intensified these sentiments, leading to tensions and ultimately contributing to the desire for separate national identities, which culminated in the eventual division following World War I. This clash of nationalisms highlighted the differing aspirations of the Ottoman subjects, undermining the unity of the empire.


Which religion inspired the Ottoman Empire?

No religion "inspired" the Ottoman Empire. The Ottoman Empire had Sunni Islam as its State Religion, but it was not a view or tenet of Islam to create an Ottoman Empire.


An impact of the Young Turks on the Ottoman Empire was?

The Young Turks played a pivotal role in the modernization and reform of the Ottoman Empire during the early 20th century. They sought to establish a constitutional government, promote nationalism, and implement social and economic reforms aimed at revitalizing the empire. Their rise to power marked a shift towards secularism and modernization, though it also contributed to ethnic tensions and conflicts within the diverse empire. Ultimately, their influence set the stage for significant political changes, including the eventual dissolution of the Ottoman Empire after World War I.


By what year did the ottoman empire reach its farthest southern extent?

The Eyalet of Egypt, a province within the Ottoman Empire, conquered the Somaliland coast (the area around and including Berbera) in 1548. This was the southernmost point in the Ottoman Empire.


How did the pan Slavic help break up the ottoman empire?

Pan-Slavism, a political and cultural movement aimed at uniting Slavic peoples, played a significant role in undermining the Ottoman Empire by fostering national consciousness among Slavic groups within its territories. As Slavic nationalism grew, it encouraged various ethnic groups, such as the Serbs and Bulgarians, to seek independence from Ottoman rule. This newfound unity and desire for self-determination fueled uprisings and conflicts, contributing to the weakening of the empire. Ultimately, the rise of Pan-Slavism coincided with the decline of Ottoman control, facilitating the emergence of new nation-states in the Balkans.

Related Questions

With help from Russia Serbia A created a sense of nationalism in Serbia B gained autonomy within the ottoman empire C overthrew the ottoman emperor?

b :)


Why does nationalism explain the split between the Turks and the Arabs within the ottoman empire?

Nationalism fueled the split between Turks and Arabs in the Ottoman Empire as both groups sought self-determination and cultural identity. While Turkish nationalism promoted the dominance of the Turkish language and culture, Arab nationalism emerged in response, advocating for Arab identity and independence. The decline of the empire intensified these sentiments, leading to tensions and ultimately contributing to the desire for separate national identities, which culminated in the eventual division following World War I. This clash of nationalisms highlighted the differing aspirations of the Ottoman subjects, undermining the unity of the empire.


How did nationalism cause unrest in the balkans in the late 1800s?

all the different groups within the Ottoman and Austrailian-Hungary Empires began to press for independence.


Which religion inspired the Ottoman Empire?

No religion "inspired" the Ottoman Empire. The Ottoman Empire had Sunni Islam as its State Religion, but it was not a view or tenet of Islam to create an Ottoman Empire.


What serbs gained autonomy within?

The Ottoman Empire


In the early 1800s serbs gained autonomy within?

The ottoman empire


How did Bulgaria declare independence?

Bulgaria was established in 1878 by the Treaty of Berlin as an autonomous republic within the Ottoman Empire. Independence from the Ottoman Empire was proclaimed in 1908.


By what year did the ottoman empire reach its farthest southern extent?

The Eyalet of Egypt, a province within the Ottoman Empire, conquered the Somaliland coast (the area around and including Berbera) in 1548. This was the southernmost point in the Ottoman Empire.


How did nationalism cause unrest in the Balkans the late 1800s?

all the different groups within the Ottoman and Austrailian-Hungary Empires began to press for independence.


How did nationalism cause unrest in Balkans in the late 1800?

all the different groups within the Ottoman and Austrailian-Hungary Empires began to press for independence.


Within the period from 1450 to 1800 compare the processes ex Political social and economic of empire building in the Spanish empire with empire building processes in one of the following Ottoman?

idk man..im mad confused ap world is the bomb! Within the period from 1450 to 1800 compare the processes (e.g. Political, social and economic) of empire building in the Spanish empire with empire building processes in one of the following: Ottoman or Russian


What role did the Sunni and Shia divisions play in the decline of the Ottoman Empire?

The Sunni and Shia divisions within the Ottoman Empire contributed to internal conflicts and power struggles, weakening the empire's unity and stability. This division led to political and social unrest, making it difficult for the empire to effectively govern its diverse population and territories.