They suffered a lot of pain and acted as slaves most of the time. They had NO money and could not afford any good clothes. Peasants were treated poorly and didn't have enough to eat. It was very hard and sad.
king Richard the second and he was only 14 at the time
first time peasants stood up for them selves?
If you mean the Peasants Revolt of 1381, that would be Richard II. He was only a boy at the time.
Richard II was king of England at that time.
The Peasant Revolt, also known as the Peasants' Revolt of 1381 in England, was a major uprising against oppressive socioeconomic conditions, particularly high taxes and feudal injustices. Triggered by the poll tax and fueled by grievances over serfdom and the aftermath of the Black Death, the revolt saw thousands of peasants marching to London, led by figures like Wat Tyler. The uprising ultimately ended in violence when Tyler was killed during negotiations, leading to the suppression of the revolt and the execution of many participants. Although it failed to achieve immediate reforms, it highlighted the deep social tensions of the time and laid the groundwork for future changes in class relations.
king Richard the second and he was only 14 at the time
first time peasants stood up for them selves?
If you mean the Peasants Revolt of 1381, that would be Richard II. He was only a boy at the time.
Sir William Walworth.
Richard II was king of England at that time.
The Peasants' Revolt took place in England in 1381. They were upset when the nobles instituted another poll tax for them to pay. The peasants were also forced to work for free on church land, sometimes two days a week. This didn't leave them enough time to work their own land and their families often went hungry as a result.
The Peasant Revolt, also known as the Peasants' Revolt of 1381 in England, was a major uprising against oppressive socioeconomic conditions, particularly high taxes and feudal injustices. Triggered by the poll tax and fueled by grievances over serfdom and the aftermath of the Black Death, the revolt saw thousands of peasants marching to London, led by figures like Wat Tyler. The uprising ultimately ended in violence when Tyler was killed during negotiations, leading to the suppression of the revolt and the execution of many participants. Although it failed to achieve immediate reforms, it highlighted the deep social tensions of the time and laid the groundwork for future changes in class relations.
Wat Tyler was a key figure in the Peasants' Revolt of 1381 in England. He is believed to have had a family, including a wife and children, although specific details about them are scarce. His family's circumstances contributed to his motivations for leading the revolt against oppressive taxation and social inequality. The revolt ultimately aimed to address the grievances of the lower classes during a time of economic hardship.
Depends on what era you're speaking of, but the main reason why all peasants revolted in any period of time was because of the need for freedom, fights against corrupt policies,for righteousness, more pay etc.
The Peasants' Revolt happened in 1381 because of high taxes and poor economic conditions. It was not immediately successful, but the long term effects improved conditions for poor people. There is a link below to an article on the Peasants' Revolt.
The Pugachev revolt and its suppression ultimately gave credit to Catherine the Great, who proved that although she was an Enlightened Despot, crushed any rebellion against her authority. This seemed like a trait of an Absolute Monarch. However, the Pugachev Rebellion also displayed the discontentment of the peasants during this time period and also forshadowed rebellions to come.
Yes he was. That is why he took part in the Peasants Revolt in 1381. If he was a royal or if he was rich then he would be okay with the taxes (which were a problem at the time after the black death) and would be able to pay them.