0
The Romans turned the conquered territories into provinces of the Romans Empire which were administered by a governor. They allowed the conquered peoples to practice their religions, follow their customs and use their traditional laws at the local level. They stationed troops in the provinces but in most cases, after pacification, their role was the maintenance of order and security and the deference of trade routes. The soldiers also provided a market for the sale of goods they needed. The Romans also built infrastructure: roads, bridges, ports, dams, aqueducts, baths, warehouses and public buildings.
Most of the conquered peoples befitted from being integrated in the thriving trading network of the empire.
The Romans were ruthless in dealing with rebellions.
What else can I help you with?
Who did Octavian defeat to take control of the roman government?
Octavian took the title of Augustus in 27 BCE.
Why did the army of the Roman Empire had control of the government?
The military took it over and defended it. The Roman knack of government successfully ruled and controlled it.
How were Greece's government different then Rome's government?
The Greek world of over 2,ooo independent city-states was different form the Roman Empire which ruled a vast area of territories with their own local government overseen by Roman provincial governors.
Who was in control of the roman state under the republican type of government?
The Senate looked after the interests of the Roman state during the Republic.
How did the roman republic transform into an empire?
Rome was initially a city-state with about 50 square miles of territory to sustain itself. With small farms, the citizens could not split them up between their sons and so sought extra land for them. The surrounding city-states were bent on the same need, so they clashed, with Romme losing some, but on average winning most fights. As winners they took land and expanded.This expansion created more strife, and expansion, leading to dominance of Italy. As a rising power, cities in southern Gaul (France), Spain and Sicily sought Rome's assistance, and as a land power it allied itself with Carthage, a sea power. This arrangement came to an end when Rome supported Greek cities in Sicily against Carthaginian encroachment. A win in the First Punic (Carthaginian) War put the Romans on the path to empire, which was consilidated with the extirmination of Carthage in the Third Punic War in 146 BCE. At this stage Rome dominated the Western Mediterranean.After their victory in the Second Punic War in 202 BCE Rome set out to punish Macedonia for aiding Carthage during that war. This dragged them into conflicts in the rest of Greece, which extended the empire there, leading further and further as other cities solicited their help in local disputes in the 2nd and 1st Centuries BCE, which swallowed up the eastern Mediterranean and Middle East.Once they started getting dragged into troubles in the west, then in the east with the Hellenistic Kingdoms it gained a momentum which they had little control of, even if they wished, and ambitious generals were always anxious to go further. It was brought to a halt when Augustus, after the Civil Wars, put a stop to expansion and consolidated the empire within a defensive border of the Rhine-Danube and the Euphrates Rivers. This worked for a couple of centuries.Addition:The government of Rome developed into an empire by gaining territory mainly from wars, but at times from treaty and inheritance.
How was holy roman empire like the old roman empire?
it united its territories under a central government
How was the Holy Roman Empire like the old Roman empire?
it united its territories under a central government
What is the objective of Charles V?
Charles V aimed to maintain and strengthen the power and influence of the Habsburg dynasty in Europe. He sought to defend and expand Habsburg territories, promote Catholicism, and maintain control over a diverse array of territories, including Spain, the Holy Roman Empire, and various other regions.
What Roman regions aren't in Europe?
The African, Mideast, and Near Asian territories were all under Roman control and were not in Europe.
How were the Romans shrewd rulers?
The Romans were shrewd rulers because they developed a sophisticated system of governance that included a network of roads, efficient communication, and strong military control. They also allowed for some degree of local self-government in conquered territories, which helped to maintain stability and loyalty among their subjects. Additionally, the Romans were skilled at assimilating and incorporating aspects of different cultures into their own, which helped them to maintain control over a diverse empire.
Who did Octavian defeat to take control of the roman government?
Octavian took the title of Augustus in 27 BCE.
Why did the army of the Roman Empire had control of the government?
The military took it over and defended it. The Roman knack of government successfully ruled and controlled it.
How were Greece's government different then Rome's government?
The Greek world of over 2,ooo independent city-states was different form the Roman Empire which ruled a vast area of territories with their own local government overseen by Roman provincial governors.
Who was in control of the roman state under the republican type of government?
The Senate looked after the interests of the Roman state during the Republic.
What was the most important roman?
The art of government - to leave local self-government in place and provide provincial government to maintain internal order and external defence.
Which continents did roman not control Asia Australia Africa or Europe?
Ancient Rome did not control any single continent; it had territories and provinces on all the continents except Australia, but did not control the entire land mass.
When did rome empire replace the republic?
The Roman empire never replaced the republic. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. As soon as Rome began gaining territories and governing them under Roman law it became an empire. What is erroneously referred to as the "Roman Empire" is actually the Principate. This form of government came into being in 31 BC after Octavian won supreme power.The Roman empire never replaced the republic. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. As soon as Rome began gaining territories and governing them under Roman law it became an empire. What is erroneously referred to as the "Roman Empire" is actually the Principate. This form of government came into being in 31 BC after Octavian won supreme power.The Roman empire never replaced the republic. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. As soon as Rome began gaining territories and governing them under Roman law it became an empire. What is erroneously referred to as the "Roman Empire" is actually the Principate. This form of government came into being in 31 BC after Octavian won supreme power.The Roman empire never replaced the republic. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. As soon as Rome began gaining territories and governing them under Roman law it became an empire. What is erroneously referred to as the "Roman Empire" is actually the Principate. This form of government came into being in 31 BC after Octavian won supreme power.The Roman empire never replaced the republic. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. As soon as Rome began gaining territories and governing them under Roman law it became an empire. What is erroneously referred to as the "Roman Empire" is actually the Principate. This form of government came into being in 31 BC after Octavian won supreme power.The Roman empire never replaced the republic. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. As soon as Rome began gaining territories and governing them under Roman law it became an empire. What is erroneously referred to as the "Roman Empire" is actually the Principate. This form of government came into being in 31 BC after Octavian won supreme power.The Roman empire never replaced the republic. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. As soon as Rome began gaining territories and governing them under Roman law it became an empire. What is erroneously referred to as the "Roman Empire" is actually the Principate. This form of government came into being in 31 BC after Octavian won supreme power.The Roman empire never replaced the republic. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. As soon as Rome began gaining territories and governing them under Roman law it became an empire. What is erroneously referred to as the "Roman Empire" is actually the Principate. This form of government came into being in 31 BC after Octavian won supreme power.The Roman empire never replaced the republic. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. As soon as Rome began gaining territories and governing them under Roman law it became an empire. What is erroneously referred to as the "Roman Empire" is actually the Principate. This form of government came into being in 31 BC after Octavian won supreme power.
