the size of their empire was difficult to defend against barbarian invasions.
There were several reasons for the fall of the Roman Empire. One of the principle reasons was the split of the Empire into two parts which began with Diocletian. The true answer to the question is still up for debate but I am a historian and the down and dirty answer is this: The Roman government got complaisant and stopped caring about expanding and governing the Empire. This allowed outside forces to put pressure on the Empire and eventually invade and conquer Rome.
The roman empire extended for about 4500 miles from west to east.
Three? A recent German study has come up with 210 reasons for the decline and fall of the Roman empire. (Don't worry, I won't list them all) Three of the main reasons were a population shift which caused pressure on the borders. The population shift came about because Germanic tribes were being pushed into Roman territory by Asian tribes. The Roman army at the fall, was weak and apathetic as there was no incentive for a strong army, such as loot and Roman citizenship for the auxiliaries. There was, in addition, a monetary factor, as more money left the empire than was taken in, due to excessive consumerism.
The Roman empire was important because of its size, its culture, its achievements and its longevity. It was also the root of our western culture.The Roman empire was important because of its size, its culture, its achievements and its longevity. It was also the root of our western culture.The Roman empire was important because of its size, its culture, its achievements and its longevity. It was also the root of our western culture.The Roman empire was important because of its size, its culture, its achievements and its longevity. It was also the root of our western culture.The Roman empire was important because of its size, its culture, its achievements and its longevity. It was also the root of our western culture.The Roman empire was important because of its size, its culture, its achievements and its longevity. It was also the root of our western culture.The Roman empire was important because of its size, its culture, its achievements and its longevity. It was also the root of our western culture.The Roman empire was important because of its size, its culture, its achievements and its longevity. It was also the root of our western culture.The Roman empire was important because of its size, its culture, its achievements and its longevity. It was also the root of our western culture.
The Roman Empire reached its greatest extent under Trajan in 116 AD.
There were several reasons for the fall of the Roman Empire. One of the principle reasons was the split of the Empire into two parts which began with Diocletian. The true answer to the question is still up for debate but I am a historian and the down and dirty answer is this: The Roman government got complaisant and stopped caring about expanding and governing the Empire. This allowed outside forces to put pressure on the Empire and eventually invade and conquer Rome.
The roman empire extended for about 4500 miles from west to east.
Three? A recent German study has come up with 210 reasons for the decline and fall of the Roman empire. (Don't worry, I won't list them all) Three of the main reasons were a population shift which caused pressure on the borders. The population shift came about because Germanic tribes were being pushed into Roman territory by Asian tribes. The Roman army at the fall, was weak and apathetic as there was no incentive for a strong army, such as loot and Roman citizenship for the auxiliaries. There was, in addition, a monetary factor, as more money left the empire than was taken in, due to excessive consumerism.
The Roman empire was important because of its size, its culture, its achievements and its longevity. It was also the root of our western culture.The Roman empire was important because of its size, its culture, its achievements and its longevity. It was also the root of our western culture.The Roman empire was important because of its size, its culture, its achievements and its longevity. It was also the root of our western culture.The Roman empire was important because of its size, its culture, its achievements and its longevity. It was also the root of our western culture.The Roman empire was important because of its size, its culture, its achievements and its longevity. It was also the root of our western culture.The Roman empire was important because of its size, its culture, its achievements and its longevity. It was also the root of our western culture.The Roman empire was important because of its size, its culture, its achievements and its longevity. It was also the root of our western culture.The Roman empire was important because of its size, its culture, its achievements and its longevity. It was also the root of our western culture.The Roman empire was important because of its size, its culture, its achievements and its longevity. It was also the root of our western culture.
i think Hadrian
The Roman Empire reached its greatest extent under Trajan in 116 AD.
no romes was bigger
No. It was under Trajan that the empire reached its largest size.
The Roman Empire reached its greatest extent in 116 under Trajan.
Communications and transport.
Please clarify your question. The word "who" refers to a person, the word "empire" is a thing. Are you asking about an emperor or the size of the empire?
after many wars,poverty,and such size,the army collapsed, citizens rebbeled,and invaders barged in. in 1806 napoleon`s franceconqured the remains of the empire.:the empire was not holy or roman.