World War One will forever be known for it's method of fighting. Opposing armies would "dig in" approx. 30 metres from each other. The area in between them was called No Mans Land, and it was a barren landscape of scattered and waterfilled shellholes, tangled rolls of barbed wire, and the rotting and decomposing bodies of each side.
The trenches themselves were 5-6 feet deep (but in the soft muds of Passchendaele, most were shallower). The trench's bottoms were covered in duckboards, which completely disappeared in someplaces. Water had a constant prescence in the trenches. At times, it was waist deep. Rats and lice thrived here. All in all, this was not the glorious war the soldiers had been rallied about. The top of the trenches had sandbags perched on the mud. This was called the parapet.
The method of fighting used involved the soldiers of one side to rush up and "Over The Top" the parapet and rush towards their enemy with bayonets drawn. After trying to avoid the hail of machine gun bullets, grenades, bursting shells and anything else that the opposing army could throw at them, the soldiers would then engage in hand to hand fighting in the enemy trench. As you can see, fighting this way was costly.
"Trench warfare was used in World War I"
No, trench warfare was not widely used in World War II as it was in World War I.
Trench Warfare.
The First World War was so costly because of the amount of ammunition and shells used. When it settled down into trench warfare, it rapidly became a war of attrition.
Yes, World War II did involve trench warfare, but it was not as prevalent as it was in World War I. Trenches were still used in some battles, but the war also saw the use of new tactics and technologies that reduced the reliance on trench warfare.
a war of attrition means a slow-moving war which takes place in the trenches. it is trench warfare. neither side leaves their trench and enemies are slowly picked off. the conditions in the trenches were horrible and neither side knew how to deal with trench war fare, therefore the was goes VERY slow.
"Trench warfare was used in World War I"
No, trench warfare was not widely used in World War II as it was in World War I.
World War 1 introduced aerial warfare with airplanes and trench warfare
Trench Warfare.
The First World War was so costly because of the amount of ammunition and shells used. When it settled down into trench warfare, it rapidly became a war of attrition.
Trench warfare. They would sit in trenches and shoot at the enemy trench
Trench warfare. They would sit in trenches and shoot at the enemy trench
Trench Warfare
Trench Warfare
trench warfare chemical warfare
Trench Warfare