poo poo wee wee testicle balls boobs
they use the evidence from the past that will tell them what exactly happened, or they ask people who were at that certain place and time.
Historians use evidence such as documents, artifacts, and oral histories to reconstruct and interpret past events and societies. They critically analyze these sources for authenticity, context, and perspective, often comparing multiple accounts to gain a more comprehensive understanding. By synthesizing this evidence, historians can build narratives that explain the complexities of human experiences over time. This rigorous methodology allows them to draw conclusions about social, political, and cultural developments in history.
No they don't because some historians believe that the universe was created by the big bang and others by god. Or the dinosaurs some historians think they were killed by a meteor. They don't agree about everything because there isn't enough evidence to prove something. And it is OK.
Historians rely on primary sources to reach conclusions. Gaps in history, where there is no written documentation of events may leave historians in a quandary. They must then rely on archaeological evidence, and secondary sources, if available. Historians must ask the following: Is the information reliable? What was the reputation of the writer at the time? Does the archaeological record, primary, or secondary sources disagree with previously published historiography concerning the person or event? How accurate is prior published historiography concerning the subject matter? New evidence can displace old theories regarding history, so historians must be ready to adjust their thesis to reflect this information. Historians must also recognize that myth may shroud the truth about history. "Lost Cause" mythology concerning the American Civil War is a good example of lies perpetuated as history that has been disproved by primary sources.
The Rosetta Stone had three different languages one of which was Greek, and another was hieroglyphs. Historians already knew Greek so they used it to sort of decode the hieroglyphics.
Historians analyze evidence by examining its reliability, relevance, and context. They assess the source of the evidence, its bias, and corroborating or contradictory evidence to form a well-supported interpretation of the past. Additionally, historians use critical thinking skills to evaluate the perspectives and motives of the sources providing the evidence.
Historians look for evidence to support their understanding and interpretation of the past. Evidence helps validate their arguments, provide context, and support conclusions about historical events and figures. By examining various forms of evidence, historians can construct a more accurate and nuanced understanding of history.
It is believed by historians, both ancient and modern, that Cleopatra killed herself by some sort of poison or a combination of poisons.It is believed by historians, both ancient and modern, that Cleopatra killed herself by some sort of poison or a combination of poisons.It is believed by historians, both ancient and modern, that Cleopatra killed herself by some sort of poison or a combination of poisons.It is believed by historians, both ancient and modern, that Cleopatra killed herself by some sort of poison or a combination of poisons.It is believed by historians, both ancient and modern, that Cleopatra killed herself by some sort of poison or a combination of poisons.It is believed by historians, both ancient and modern, that Cleopatra killed herself by some sort of poison or a combination of poisons.It is believed by historians, both ancient and modern, that Cleopatra killed herself by some sort of poison or a combination of poisons.It is believed by historians, both ancient and modern, that Cleopatra killed herself by some sort of poison or a combination of poisons.It is believed by historians, both ancient and modern, that Cleopatra killed herself by some sort of poison or a combination of poisons.
Historians who dig up evidence are often referred to as archaeologists. Archaeologists study past human societies through the recovery and analysis of material culture and environmental data. They excavate sites, analyze artifacts, and interpret their findings to understand more about ancient civilizations.
The writings of contemporary historians.
i think, they will study what we did in life
The steps historians take include studying the lives of ppl in different times and places is the work of the historians. The most basic tool for this work is historical evidence. Historians collect the evidence, then use it to interpret events. Historians look first at a primary source, first hand information about ppl or events or a secondary source that is stated after the fact.
Comparing and contrasting historical sources
Historians look for evidence about the distant past in myths and legends because myths and legends tell what people believed and understood. Historians study by looking at journals, data, diaries etc., to learn information.
Historians have gathered evidence on how the Nok people lived through the discovery of terracotta sculptures, pottery, and iron artifacts. These artifacts suggest that the Nok people were skilled in pottery making, metalworking, agriculture, and trade. The society was likely organized into small settlements engaged in farming and likely had social hierarchies.
Historians identify the Neolithic Revolution through a combination of archaeological evidence and the study of ancient texts and artifacts. They look for signs of the transition from a hunter-gatherer lifestyle to settled agriculture and the domestication of plants and animals. This includes the presence of farming tools, evidence of grain storage and cultivation, and the establishment of permanent settlements.
Historians use the evidence they find to analyze and interpret the past, draw conclusions, and form historical narratives. They evaluate the reliability and significance of the evidence to construct well-grounded arguments about historical events and trends. Critical thinking and interpretation are essential skills historians utilize to make sense of the past based on the information available.