Historians support their conclusions by critically analyzing primary and secondary sources, including documents, artifacts, and previous scholarly works. They evaluate the reliability and context of these sources, considering factors such as authorship, purpose, and audience. Additionally, historians often cross-reference information to establish a more comprehensive understanding of events and trends, while also engaging in peer review to refine their interpretations. This rigorous methodology helps ensure that their conclusions are well-substantiated and credible.
Most historians agree to that conclusion. it is a firsthand record of a person, place or event.;
that Jefferson wanted it to have the government and the people to have equal power and IT IS NOT CANDY
Answer this question… They both mobilized entire populations in support of the war effort.
The conclusion is a short summary of what you have said in your essay. You need to decide what sentence best explains your topic! Nobody else can give you a "good conclusion" because our ideas will support your topic. If you just start writing, you will be through with your assignment before you know it!
Historical sources are essential to historians because they provide primary evidence of past events, cultures, and societal norms. These sources, which can include documents, artifacts, and oral histories, help historians construct accurate narratives and understand the context of historical occurrences. By analyzing these materials, historians can identify patterns, draw connections, and challenge or support existing interpretations of history. Ultimately, historical sources enrich our comprehension of human experiences across time.
a conclusion helps the data
To be closer to the gods in the heavens.
you need to ask ----> Does my conclusion support my hypothesis?
Drawing Conclusions
Paco and Eva's data showed a clear trend that supported my conclusion. Their findings aligned with my hypothesis and provided additional evidence to support the validity of the conclusion drawn. The consistency between our data reinforced the strength of the conclusion reached.
to explain why the data support or reject the hypothesis
Historians look for evidence to support their understanding and interpretation of the past. Evidence helps validate their arguments, provide context, and support conclusions about historical events and figures. By examining various forms of evidence, historians can construct a more accurate and nuanced understanding of history.
To investigate the Kennedy assassination. While flawed, the report's conclusion is not in doubt by any real (mainstream) historians.
booboo penis
Yes, an argument with a tautologous conclusion can be considered invalid because it does not provide any new information or reasoning to support its conclusion.
An inductive argument is characterized by its support rather than its ability to conclusively prove its conclusion. Inductive reasoning involves drawing general conclusions based on specific observations or evidence, which may support a conclusion but not guarantee its truth.
The conclusion either supports or rejects the hypothesis based on the data and results obtained during the experiment or study. If the conclusion aligns with the hypothesis, it supports it. If the conclusion contradicts the hypothesis, it rejects it.