0
Historians support their conclusions by critically analyzing primary and secondary sources, including documents, artifacts, and previous scholarly works. They evaluate the reliability and context of these sources, considering factors such as authorship, purpose, and audience. Additionally, historians often cross-reference information to establish a more comprehensive understanding of events and trends, while also engaging in peer review to refine their interpretations. This rigorous methodology helps ensure that their conclusions are well-substantiated and credible.
What else can I help you with?
Is it true that a primary source of tension between settlers in Texas and the Mexican government was Mexico's abolition of slavery?
Most historians agree to that conclusion. it is a firsthand record of a person, place or event.;
What facts support the conclusion that Jefferson was not a federalist?
that Jefferson wanted it to have the government and the people to have equal power and IT IS NOT CANDY
Why do historians consider both wars to have been total wars?
Answer this question… They both mobilized entire populations in support of the war effort.
What is a good conclusion to an essay about 9-11-01?
The conclusion is a short summary of what you have said in your essay. You need to decide what sentence best explains your topic! Nobody else can give you a "good conclusion" because our ideas will support your topic. If you just start writing, you will be through with your assignment before you know it!
What conclusion has been drawn by historians?
Historians often conclude that historical events are shaped by a complex interplay of social, political, economic, and cultural factors. They emphasize the importance of context and perspective in understanding the past, recognizing that interpretations can change over time as new evidence emerges. Additionally, historians frequently highlight the significance of diverse voices and experiences in shaping historical narratives. Ultimately, their conclusions aim to provide a more nuanced understanding of human behavior and societal development throughout history.
What is used to support a conclusion?
a conclusion helps the data
What conclusion have archaeologists and historians reached about the reason the Sumerians built ziggurats?
To be closer to the gods in the heavens.
What might you ask yourself when drawing a conclusion?
you need to ask ----> Does my conclusion support my hypothesis?
When drawing a conclusion scientist examine the data to see if it supports or fails to support the hypothesis?
Drawing Conclusions
How was Paco and Eva's data support your conclusion?
Paco and Eva's data showed a clear trend that supported my conclusion. Their findings aligned with my hypothesis and provided additional evidence to support the validity of the conclusion drawn. The consistency between our data reinforced the strength of the conclusion reached.
What is the of a conclusion?
to explain why the data support or reject the hypothesis
Why do historians look for evidence?
Historians look for evidence to support their understanding and interpretation of the past. Evidence helps validate their arguments, provide context, and support conclusions about historical events and figures. By examining various forms of evidence, historians can construct a more accurate and nuanced understanding of history.
What was the warren commission's job?
To investigate the Kennedy assassination. While flawed, the report's conclusion is not in doubt by any real (mainstream) historians.
How is evidence from data used to support the conclusion?
booboo penis
Can an argument with a tautologous conclusion be considered invalid?
Yes, an argument with a tautologous conclusion can be considered invalid because it does not provide any new information or reasoning to support its conclusion.
What argument is characterized by its support rather than its ability to prove its conclusion?
An inductive argument is characterized by its support rather than its ability to conclusively prove its conclusion. Inductive reasoning involves drawing general conclusions based on specific observations or evidence, which may support a conclusion but not guarantee its truth.
Does your conclusion support or reject your hyphothesis?
The conclusion either supports or rejects the hypothesis based on the data and results obtained during the experiment or study. If the conclusion aligns with the hypothesis, it supports it. If the conclusion contradicts the hypothesis, it rejects it.
