0
Persian policy of tolerance is acceptance of the people the Persians conquered.
Therefore it grew so much because it did not matter if they conquered or not, it wasn't going to change the people's lifestyle in any way. They respected the customs of the diverse groups in their empire.
EXAMPLE: the culture they conquered would not have to change their religious views.
What else can I help you with?
Why was the official policy of religious tolerance more crucial to the stability of the Persian Empire than it was to the Greek civilization?
The Persian Empire was a massive empire where peoples under Persian governance had numerous different major religions, such as Zoroastrianism, Judaism, the Hellenic Pantheon, the Levantine Pantheon, the Ancient Egyptian Pantheon, and the Mesopotamian Pantheon. By contrast, all of the Greek city states believed in the same Hellenic Pantheon and so no tolerance of other religions was necessary for societal stability.
What effect did akbur policy of religious tolerance have on his empire?
Akbar's policy of religious tolerance, known as Sulh-i-Kul, fostered a climate of peace and harmony among the diverse religious communities in his empire, particularly between Hindus and Muslims. This inclusivity helped to stabilize his rule and encouraged cooperation in governance and trade. It also led to cultural syncretism, enriching the arts and architecture of the Mughal Empire. Overall, Akbar's approach contributed to the longevity and cohesion of his empire during a time of significant diversity.
Which ottoman leader did not adopt a policy of religious tolerance?
Sultan Abdul Hamid II, who reigned from 1876 to 1909, is often noted for not adopting a policy of religious tolerance during his rule. He implemented a more authoritarian regime and sought to consolidate Islamic identity within the Ottoman Empire, which alienated various religious and ethnic groups. His policies contributed to tensions and conflicts, particularly with Christian minorities and nationalist movements within the empire.
Do you see any lessons about religions tolerance today from the history of persecution of the christians in the Roman Empire?
This is for you to decide. Did repression work? Why did Galerius, who was the main instigator of Diocletian's Great Persecution, decreed the end of this persecution seven years later? Why did he do so for peace and security in the empire? Why was it only the Christian religion which was persecuted? What were the benefits of the Romans' policy of tolerance of the religions of the conquered peoples? Note that Christianity was not always persecuted. There were periods of tolerance and periods of persecution.
Did Alexander The Great let Persian governors govern?
In most provinces he appointed a Macedonian general a governor, but he also had a policy of integrating the Persian aristocracy with the intent of gaining their support. He died before the impact could be felt, and his generals divided the empire into kingdoms of their own.
How did the Persian policy of tolerance affect the Empire?
The Persian policy of tolerance, exemplified by rulers like Cyrus the Great, fostered a sense of loyalty among diverse ethnic and religious groups within the empire. By allowing local customs and religions to flourish, the Persians minimized rebellion and promoted stability across their vast territories. This inclusiveness facilitated trade and communication, contributing to the empire's economic prosperity and cultural exchange. Ultimately, this approach helped the Persian Empire maintain control over a diverse population for centuries.
Persian kinks allowed conquered people to keep their own religions true or false?
True. Persian kings allowed conquered people to keep their own religions, as long as they paid tribute to the Persian king and acknowledged his authority. This policy of religious tolerance helped the Persian Empire maintain power over its vast territory.
Which Persian Empire started the live and let live policy?
The Achaaemenid Empire.
Why was an official policy of religious tolerance more crucial to the stability of the Persian Empire than it was to the Greek civilization?
The Greek world had a fairly uniform religion and set of gods. The Persian Empire, stretching from Egypt to central Asia, covered a wide variety of peoples and religions, and it was not the Persian policy to incite religious revolts when they were trying to establish a peaceful and prosperous empire.
What was romes policy toward most of the religions in the empire?
Rome had a policy of tolerance toward most of the religions or forms of worship in the empire.
Why was the official policy of religious tolerance more crucial to the stability of the Persian Empire than it was to the Greek civilization?
The Persian Empire was a massive empire where peoples under Persian governance had numerous different major religions, such as Zoroastrianism, Judaism, the Hellenic Pantheon, the Levantine Pantheon, the Ancient Egyptian Pantheon, and the Mesopotamian Pantheon. By contrast, all of the Greek city states believed in the same Hellenic Pantheon and so no tolerance of other religions was necessary for societal stability.
Why was the official policy of religious tolerance more crucial to the stability of Persian empire then it was to Greek civilization?
The official policy of religious tolerance in the Persian Empire was crucial for its stability because it allowed for the integration of diverse cultures and beliefs across its vast territories, reducing the likelihood of rebellion and unrest among various groups. In contrast, Greek civilization, characterized by city-states with distinct identities and rivalries, did not face the same level of cultural diversity within a unified political structure, allowing for more localized governance and less need for overarching tolerance. Thus, the Persian approach facilitated cohesion in a multicultural empire, while Greek city-states thrived on a more homogeneous cultural identity.
Why was Persian culture so diverse?
Because the policy led to cultural diversity in the empire.
What effect did akbur policy of religious tolerance have on his empire?
Akbar's policy of religious tolerance, known as Sulh-i-Kul, fostered a climate of peace and harmony among the diverse religious communities in his empire, particularly between Hindus and Muslims. This inclusivity helped to stabilize his rule and encouraged cooperation in governance and trade. It also led to cultural syncretism, enriching the arts and architecture of the Mughal Empire. Overall, Akbar's approach contributed to the longevity and cohesion of his empire during a time of significant diversity.
How was Cyrus rule different from eariler empires?
Cyrus the Great's rule differed from earlier empires through his approach to governance and cultural tolerance. Unlike many conquerors who imposed their culture and beliefs, Cyrus respected the customs and religions of the peoples he conquered, allowing them to maintain their traditions. This policy of tolerance helped to unify his diverse empire and foster loyalty among his subjects. Additionally, Cyrus established a more organized administrative system, promoting infrastructure and trade, which contributed to the stability and prosperity of the Persian Empire.
Why was an official policy of religious tolerance more crucial to the stability of the Persian Empire than to the Greek civilization?
A natural pert of the Greek culture was their religion. The Persians ruled over a large variety of peoples with different religious culture, and it would have been stupid to try to impose one religion on them. The Persians concentrated on security and prosperity, leaving the different people to follow their own beliefs.
How did Cyrus build the first empire?
Cyrus the Great built the first Persian Empire through a combination of military conquests, strategic diplomacy, and effective governance. He united the Medes and Persians and expanded his territory by defeating rivals such as the Lydians and Babylonians. His policy of tolerance and respect for local customs and religions helped integrate diverse populations into his empire, fostering stability and loyalty. This approach, alongside strong administrative practices, laid the foundation for one of the largest empires in ancient history.
