The Roman citizens voted for senators to represent them and 2 consuls are chosen to govern Rome. oops, a slight correction is needed. The senators were never elected by the Roman people, their selection was not a democratic one .
yes it did
The Roman Empire
The leadership of each ghetto (the Judenrat) was chosen by the Nazis.
The primary leadership lesson from the fall of the Roman Empire would be to never hire mercenaries to protect your borders. The decline and fall of the Roman empire was a process that took several hundred years. With all deference to the opening sentence, it took a combination of factors that led to the fall of what is termed by many historians as the Western portion of the Roman empire. Certainly leadership was one of the many factors involved with the process, but to quantify it into a single sentence would be incorrect. As an aside, it took Gibbon in the late 1700's 6 full volumes to describe his version of the decline and fall of Rome.
The Roman empire surrounded the Mediterranean sea.The Roman empire surrounded the Mediterranean sea.The Roman empire surrounded the Mediterranean sea.The Roman empire surrounded the Mediterranean sea.The Roman empire surrounded the Mediterranean sea.The Roman empire surrounded the Mediterranean sea.The Roman empire surrounded the Mediterranean sea.The Roman empire surrounded the Mediterranean sea.The Roman empire surrounded the Mediterranean sea.
yes it did
That could be the case.....
The Roman Empire
Carthage
A dictator was chosen to rule the Roman Republic, not the Empire, during times of crisis to provide decisive leadership. The most notable example is Julius Caesar, who was appointed dictator perpetuo (dictator for life) in 44 BCE. This appointment was controversial and ultimately led to his assassination, marking a pivotal moment in the transition from Republic to Empire. After Caesar, the title of dictator became less common as the imperial system established itself.
Ancient Greece expanded to an Empire under the leadership of Alexander the Great between the years 332 and 323 BCE. Part of this Empire was absorbed by the Roman Empire at 56 BCE [last area conquered Egypt]
They were defeated armies drafted as slaves to the Roman Empire.
Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.
Claudius's leadership as Roman Emperor had mixed reviews. He expanded the Roman Empire but faced criticism for his tolerance of corruption among his advisors. He was known for his intellectual pursuits and public works initiatives.
The leadership of each ghetto (the Judenrat) was chosen by the Nazis.
It was a lifetime appointment in the Roman Republic, which preceded the empire. Senators were elected magistrates, whereas earlier they had been the sons of previous senators elected to a quaestorship position.
The primary leadership lesson from the fall of the Roman Empire would be to never hire mercenaries to protect your borders. The decline and fall of the Roman empire was a process that took several hundred years. With all deference to the opening sentence, it took a combination of factors that led to the fall of what is termed by many historians as the Western portion of the Roman empire. Certainly leadership was one of the many factors involved with the process, but to quantify it into a single sentence would be incorrect. As an aside, it took Gibbon in the late 1700's 6 full volumes to describe his version of the decline and fall of Rome.