2 years
The verdict in the trial of Susan B. Anthony was decided by the judge, Ward Hunt, who instructed the jury to find her guilty of voting illegally. This was unusual because juries typically determine the verdict based on the evidence presented, but in this case, the judge effectively removed their discretion, reflecting the political tensions surrounding women's suffrage at the time. Anthony's trial became a pivotal moment in the fight for women's rights, highlighting the systemic barriers women faced in seeking equality.
It depends on the parties in a case to demand for the Jury Trial. It is the plaintiffs right to demand for the Jury or Judge Trial. If the case is involved trial of a heinous crime or matter of public importance, case will be tried by the Jury.
The Lawyer who won the trial was Attorney William Jennings Bryan. However it might be important to point out that the verdict was later overturned by the appellate court of Tennessee.Correction: Attorney Clarance Darrow was the lawyer who won the trial. Attorney William Jennings Bryan was council for the defense. The case was still overturned on appeal.Note: the Scopes trial was not "against evolution", it was against teaching evolution in any state funded school or university. See the link below for the complete story of the Scopes trial.
Its a contest between two. The trial of Rebbecca Nurse in which she was aqquitted, people repealed the verdict and was then proclaimed guilty. She was one of the accused who had a lot of doubt surrounding her case. The other would be the Reverand George Burroughs because he was a Puritan reverand that had worked in Salem Village and had been able to recite the Lord's Prayer, something witches supposedly couldn't do.
Listen to the evidence and testimony presented by both sides - then decide on which side the truth of the case lies, and render a verdict accordingly.
Usually, at the end of a trial a jury will render a verdict. A verdict could be guilty or innocent depending on what the jury believes. Sometimes, there is no verdict and a mistrial can be declared and the case can be retried.
It means that a finding, or a verdict, has been rendered and the matter is completed.
Yes, in some cases a judge can overrule a jury's guilty verdict in a criminal case through a process called a judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) or a new trial.
In a legal case, the trial typically occurs after pre-trial procedures such as filing of the complaint, pre-trial motions, discovery, and settlement negotiations. The trial is where evidence is presented, arguments are made, and a verdict is reached.
Yes, a judge can overturn a jury verdict in a criminal case through a process called a judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) if the judge believes the jury's decision is not supported by the evidence presented during the trial.
No, it has nothing to do with the right to a speedy trial. It refers to the waiver of acceptance of a unanimous jury verdict in a case at trial.
Depends upon what kind of case it is and what trial court and local rules. As a general rule, however, a trial verdict would be appealed to the "appellate court" having jurisdiction (whether state or local). In other cases, there may be intermediate appeals, such as taking a verdict of a single justice and filing for a retrial with a jury before appealing the jury verdict to the court of appeals.
The word 'verdict' refers to the judgment rendered by the court.
Factors that contribute to a quick jury verdict in a trial include strong evidence, clear presentation of the case by attorneys, jurors' prior knowledge and biases, and the complexity of the legal issues involved.
A jury verdict is not a judgment itself, but it is a crucial step in the judicial process that leads to a judgment. The jury's verdict represents their decision on the facts of the case, determining the outcome of the trial. Following the verdict, the judge typically issues a formal judgment that reflects the jury's findings and applies the law accordingly. Thus, while a verdict informs the judgment, they are distinct components of the trial process.
The trial can be repeated without it being considered double jeopardy when a verdict was not reached unless it was dismissed with prejudiced. They reason is that you are not considered to have been tried if a verdict was not able to be reached. Sometimes a case can be dismissed with prejudice and another trial is not allowed. This can happen if they determine that they was not enough evidence to even go to the jury
A decision of a judge or court is usually called a ruling. In the case of a criminal trial the outcome of the trial is called a verdict.