A Marxist historian might explain the causes of World War I as rooted in the inherent conflicts of capitalism, particularly the struggle for imperial dominance among European powers. They would argue that capitalist nations sought to expand their markets and resources, leading to rivalries and alliances that set the stage for war. Additionally, the historian might highlight the role of class interests, suggesting that the ruling elites manipulated nationalist sentiments and militarism to divert attention from internal social tensions and class struggles. Ultimately, they would view the war as a manifestation of capitalist contradictions and the competition for economic supremacy.
A historian might describe the tactics the United States might have used to physically destroy the missiles in Cuba.
A historian might write a detailed analysis of the causes and consequences of the American Civil War, exploring social, economic, and political factors that led to the conflict. They could include primary sources, such as letters or speeches from the era, to provide context and support their arguments. This work would aim to enhance understanding of the war's impact on American society and its lasting legacy.
No, there are rumours that Hitler's grandfather might have been Jewish but no historian believes this to be the case.
A microhistorian might document one day in a town that experienced particularly high unemployment levels, while a comparative historian might graph unemployment levels in several cities throughout the Great Depression.
A person who studies ancient weapons might be a military historian, or might be an archaeologist. There is more than one reason to study ancient weapons.
The correct possessive form of "historian" is "historian's." This form indicates that something belongs to or is associated with a specific historian. For example, you might say, "The historian's research was groundbreaking."
A historian might describe the tactics the United States might have used to physically destroy the missiles in Cuba.
This is a written homework assignment for you and we don't do homework essays for students. You need to do this. For one thing your teacher is looking to see if you learned the history lesson and to have you think critically about it.
A microhistorian might document one day in a town that experienced particularly high unemployment levels, while a comparative historian might graph several cities’ unemployment levels throughout the Great Depression.
A historian might describe the tactics the United States might have used to physically destroy the missiles in Cuba.
A historian might write a detailed analysis of the causes and consequences of the American Civil War, exploring social, economic, and political factors that led to the conflict. They could include primary sources, such as letters or speeches from the era, to provide context and support their arguments. This work would aim to enhance understanding of the war's impact on American society and its lasting legacy.
Functionalism may see employment bias as a result of individuals not meeting the social norms or requirements necessary for success in the job market. Marxist theory, on the other hand, would attribute employment bias to the perpetuation of class inequalities and exploitation by the capitalist system. In terms of religious intolerance, Functionalism might view it as a disruption of social harmony and cohesion, while Marxist theory could see it as a tool used by ruling classes to divide the working class and maintain control.
(Apex) How did the role of religion in Europe change between the postclassical and modern eras?
If anxiety and depression are correlated, there are three possible directions of causality. These are anxiety causes depression, depression causes anxiety, and there is an environmental stimuli that causes both anxiety and depression.
unreliable
you might be an historian if you are good at social studies
unreliable