0
What else can I help you with?
How long did it take the roman to build an onager?
It probably took no longer than fifteen or twenty minutes for the Roman to assemble their artillery, possibly less. The army was very efficient and as much of their artillery was disassembled after use and reassembled when needed, they were experts at the job.It probably took no longer than fifteen or twenty minutes for the Roman to assemble their artillery, possibly less. The army was very efficient and as much of their artillery was disassembled after use and reassembled when needed, they were experts at the job.It probably took no longer than fifteen or twenty minutes for the Roman to assemble their artillery, possibly less. The army was very efficient and as much of their artillery was disassembled after use and reassembled when needed, they were experts at the job.It probably took no longer than fifteen or twenty minutes for the Roman to assemble their artillery, possibly less. The army was very efficient and as much of their artillery was disassembled after use and reassembled when needed, they were experts at the job.It probably took no longer than fifteen or twenty minutes for the Roman to assemble their artillery, possibly less. The army was very efficient and as much of their artillery was disassembled after use and reassembled when needed, they were experts at the job.It probably took no longer than fifteen or twenty minutes for the Roman to assemble their artillery, possibly less. The army was very efficient and as much of their artillery was disassembled after use and reassembled when needed, they were experts at the job.It probably took no longer than fifteen or twenty minutes for the Roman to assemble their artillery, possibly less. The army was very efficient and as much of their artillery was disassembled after use and reassembled when needed, they were experts at the job.It probably took no longer than fifteen or twenty minutes for the Roman to assemble their artillery, possibly less. The army was very efficient and as much of their artillery was disassembled after use and reassembled when needed, they were experts at the job.It probably took no longer than fifteen or twenty minutes for the Roman to assemble their artillery, possibly less. The army was very efficient and as much of their artillery was disassembled after use and reassembled when needed, they were experts at the job.
What is the name of the battle between the English navy and the Spanish Armada?
The Spanish Armada
What types of ships did the Armada contain?
The Spanish Armada of 1588 primarily consisted of large galleons, which were heavily armed and used for both war and trade. It also included smaller vessels such as galleys, which were rowed and utilized for maneuverability in combat, and support ships like supply and troop transport vessels. The fleet was designed to carry soldiers, artillery, and provisions for an invasion of England. Overall, the Armada comprised around 130 ships of various types, reflecting a mix of military might and logistical support.
What are some strengths of the Spanish armada?
The Spanish Armada boasted several strengths, including its formidable size, with around 130 ships and a large number of experienced sailors and soldiers. It was well-equipped with heavy artillery, giving it significant firepower in naval engagements. Additionally, the Armada had the backing of Spain's vast resources and wealth, allowing for extensive logistical support and sustained campaigns. Its goal of invading England also capitalized on Spain's strong naval traditions and strategic maritime experience.
How was the Spanish Armada defeated?
It was not so much that the English fleet destroyed the Armada. The Spanish ships were caught in gales off the coasts of Scotland and Ireland, which wrecked most of the them on the rocky coasts.
What facts about the Spanish armada?
I'm not sure if this will help much but... The Spanish Armada lost to the English fleet in 1588.
Why was the armada beaten?
Good English seamanship and very bad weather. Many of the Armada ships were converted merchant ships better suited for cargo than warfare. It was not intended to engage the English in a sea battle but to carry armed men to a designated point and off load them. Spanish artillery was poor, the English were much better. The greatest problem was that King Philip insisted on controlling the Armada. He had no training at all for naval matters. He believed that God was guiding him and thus the mission would succeed.
How much does a 37 mm artillery projectile weigh?
The US M3 artillery projectile weighed about 1 pound
How much does a 2011 Nissan Armada weigh?
3,000 pounds
How much torque does the engine in the 2005 Nissan Armada have?
The 2005 Nissan Armada's engine produces 385 ft-lbs. @ 3600 rpm.
How much torque does the engine in the 2014 Nissan Armada have?
The 2014 Nissan Armada's engine produces 385 ft-lbs. @ 3400 rpm.
How much torque does the engine in the 2006 Nissan Armada have?
The 2006 Nissan Armada's engine produces 385 ft-lbs. @ 3600 rpm.
How much torque does the engine in the 2004 Nissan Armada have?
The 2004 Nissan Armada's engine produces 385 ft-lbs. @ 3600 rpm.
How much torque does the engine in the 2013 Nissan Armada have?
The 2013 Nissan Armada's engine produces 385 ft-lbs. @ 3400 rpm.
How much torque does the engine in the 2010 Nissan Armada have?
The 2010 Nissan Armada's engine produces 385 ft-lbs. @ 3400 rpm.
How much torque does the engine in the 2008 Nissan Armada have?
The 2008 Nissan Armada's engine produces 385 ft-lbs. @ 3400 rpm.
How much torque does the engine in the 2012 Nissan Armada have?
The 2012 Nissan Armada's engine produces 385 ft-lbs. @ 3400 rpm.
