Every day
There was no special race of serfs. In the event of a recent takeover by outsiders, the serfs where of whatever the previous group had been. For example, after the Normans took England from the Anglo Saxons, the serfs were all Anglo Saxon. Aside from that, there was often no distinction. German serfs were German, as were their rulers, for example.
Generally yes, but not well. Usually the serfs had enough food to live, but they were definitely not eating square meals or high-quality foods.
Serfs typically had limited rights over the livestock they raised, which often belonged to their lords. While they could sometimes consume the livestock they owned, such as chickens or pigs, they were generally required to provide a portion of their produce and livestock to their lord as rent or tax. Thus, their ability to eat their livestock depended on their specific obligations and the regulations imposed by their feudal lord.
The serf's master was a lord. This was not always a title with a specific rank attached to it, so it could have applied to a knight, or even a person of no title at all. The person who organized serfs was often called a reeve. This person was appointed by the lord or elected by the serfs with the lords final approval, depending on the traditions at the particular manor. The reeve was often a serf himself, and acted as the representative of the other serfs to the lord, and of the lord to the other serfs. His job also included assignment of jobs and land.
The serfs diet consisted of mainly fruit and vegetables and was considered pretty healthy however the nobles diet was just full of meat and they would eat several times.
its for school
They usually eat serfs, and your face.
There was no special race of serfs. In the event of a recent takeover by outsiders, the serfs where of whatever the previous group had been. For example, after the Normans took England from the Anglo Saxons, the serfs were all Anglo Saxon. Aside from that, there was often no distinction. German serfs were German, as were their rulers, for example.
Generally yes, but not well. Usually the serfs had enough food to live, but they were definitely not eating square meals or high-quality foods.
Serfs ate a lot of brown bread and soup. They also had vegetables that they grew. They usually did not have access to much meat or rich foods.
The serf's master was a lord. This was not always a title with a specific rank attached to it, so it could have applied to a knight, or even a person of no title at all. The person who organized serfs was often called a reeve. This person was appointed by the lord or elected by the serfs with the lords final approval, depending on the traditions at the particular manor. The reeve was often a serf himself, and acted as the representative of the other serfs to the lord, and of the lord to the other serfs. His job also included assignment of jobs and land.
I believe peons, serfs and rubes are peasants. Peasants usually farm for food, some hunt, I believe. They are said to eat mostly cabbage and barley.
Blacksmiths often worked on manorial estates, and were originally serfs, though they may have been more highly regarded than other serfs. Later on, they were often independent members of the middle class.
The serfs diet consisted of mainly fruit and vegetables and was considered pretty healthy however the nobles diet was just full of meat and they would eat several times.
Serfs were tied to the land and could not be sold, whereas slaves were considered property and were often bought and sold. Serfs typically had some rights and were subject to fewer harsh treatments compared to slaves. Serfs were also a part of the feudal system, while slaves were seen as items of property in various societies.
They felt scared
Serfs were bound to the land.Best of luck to A+Serfs are bound to the land. A+