That believing the colonies will continue to do well is misleading.
Most of the European nations were too exhausted and devastated at the end of World II to continue supporting their colonies. Also, the colonies realized that their colonizers were no longer able to protect them as they originally had.
He argues that they could have done better on their own (apex)
1604 - the Spanish Armada was defeated - the way was clear for England to start colonies in North America.
Catherine The Great focused on the Russian Empire's expansion to continue the process of Westernisation begun by Peter the Great.
That believing the colonies will continue to do well is misleading.
Punishment for misbehavior...
That believing the colonies will continue to do well is misleading.
no
false
Overwatch 1 is not shutting down. The game will continue to be supported and played alongside Overwatch 2.
Primogeniture means only the oldest son (or oldest child) can inherit the entire property. The opposite of primogeniture is partible inheritance, in which more than one son (or child) can inherit parts of the property. A partible inheritance meant that the property was divided. In the case of a kingdom, that means that two kingdoms might exist where there had been one. Charlemagne's empire was divided among his grandsons in this way, giving rise to several kingdoms and a much weakened empire. Adopting primogeniture meant that kingdoms could be consolidated and enlarged over time. The descendants of Charlemagne adopted it it France, and this allowed France to continue as a nation to this day. For counties and smaller properties, the same holds true. If a count were to divide his county among a number of sons, it would produce a very much smaller inheritance for each, allowing the family to lose its base. By adopting primogeniture, the county remains a county. Younger sons who did not inherit often became knights and took smaller manorial estates.
Schools in the colonies taught kids basic education. They learned how to read, write and mathematics. If they wanted to continue their education and become a scholar, they would pursue that on their own.
The individual, independent colonies/states would continue as a loose confederation under the Articles of Confederation.
Most of the European nations were too exhausted and devastated at the end of World II to continue supporting their colonies. Also, the colonies realized that their colonizers were no longer able to protect them as they originally had.
He argues that they could have done better on their own.
That the argument is faulty and incorrect