Definitely not because, Rich children thought that the poor were horrible disgusting animals
They were not taught that the poor were horrible, disgusting animals, but there was always the risk of disease from the poor..On the plus side many philanthropic institutions were started in the UK during this time, such as The Salvation Army and Dr.Barnados, also many other minor charities and hospitals
yes it is used by rich and poor children from the Victorian times
yes. because he had sixteen children (rich)
In the Holocaust itself rich and poor Jews were treated alike: they were slaughtered. (One could not buy one's way out of the Holocaust).
Clara Barton was really poor and had never been rich.
Children living in Britain during Victorian times, were either rich or poor. If they were poor, they often had to work to help out the family.
Slum children are no different from rich children other than they are unfortunate and put in a crappy situation. They are just as smart as rich children and should be treated as such.ANSWER:Rich or poor you teach the ones who want to learn.
Rich Victorian children often had an opportunity not afforded to poor children. They often received an education while poor children worked in the factories.
there are both rich and poor people in burma . but the majority of people are poor and they get less chance in studies and employment. Rich people are preferred in urban areas rather than poor people . some won't even allow poor people in enter a certain area. poor people are treated like trash. rich people are treated like kings.
yes they did
both rich and poor
they worked- poor children went to school- rich children
poor
yes it is used by rich and poor children from the Victorian times
yes they did but not in as harsh condisions as the poor children
yes. because he had sixteen children (rich)
clothes hhshshfhshhfds
Robin Hood stole from the rich and gave money to the poor, so he treated the poor with courtesy.