It was like hell.
Everyone wanted to end the war.
That's a great question and difficult to answer. With most historical events, it depends on perspective. While most Americans support the decision, I would guess that a significant number of Japanese might feel differently. Given the factors of a costly war, an implacable enemy and a new technology, I think history will show the decision to bomb Hiroshima was justified. But I spoke with a Japanese gentleman who had lived through it and he felt the second bomb was unnecessary. The people of Japan had barely enough time to register what had happened before the second device was detonated three days later over Nagasaki.
After using the atom bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, there were a range of emotions among Americans. Some felt relief that the war would soon be over, while others felt pride and a sense of accomplishment. However, there were also concerns and moral dilemmas about the devastation caused by the bombs and the loss of civilian lives.
they were mad
The chrysanthemum on Japanese weapons has always been an insignia for the EMPEROR OF JAPAN and represents the loyalty that Japanese feel to the Emperor.
Everyone wanted to end the war.
i don't kown ask them
They were ground down through out the war due to their stubbornness to surrender the allies had to fight their way to victory across each Japanese held islands. The final blows were as a result of the atomic bomb being droped over Hiroshima on August 5th 1945 followed by Nagasaki on August 8th 1945. Any more questions regarding WW1 or WW2 feel free to ask!
I have heard many different things, but depending on what you define as a bomb-related casualty, the answer can range all the way from 70,000 to 200,000+ and climbing. frightening, really. mine is not a completely definitive answer, so feel free to question it.
Half of the dead fell ill with radiation sickness. Those who fell ill suffered up to two weeks.
They feel not too bad but some real want REVENGE
no.
That's a great question and difficult to answer. With most historical events, it depends on perspective. While most Americans support the decision, I would guess that a significant number of Japanese might feel differently. Given the factors of a costly war, an implacable enemy and a new technology, I think history will show the decision to bomb Hiroshima was justified. But I spoke with a Japanese gentleman who had lived through it and he felt the second bomb was unnecessary. The people of Japan had barely enough time to register what had happened before the second device was detonated three days later over Nagasaki.
"How do you feel" - "Szitaka srakatuka madziara"
Admiral Leahy believed that using the atomic bomb was unnecessary and morally wrong because he felt the bombing of civilian populations, particularly in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, was excessive and indiscriminate. He also argued that Japan was already on the brink of surrender, making the use of the bomb unnecessary to achieve victory.
After using the atom bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, there were a range of emotions among Americans. Some felt relief that the war would soon be over, while others felt pride and a sense of accomplishment. However, there were also concerns and moral dilemmas about the devastation caused by the bombs and the loss of civilian lives.
There is no reliable public information on North Korean nuclear weapons designs. However I feel it is reasonable to assume that they have only implosion type atomic bombs as these require much smaller quantities of fissile material. These bombs can use either Uranium, Plutonium, or both as the fissile material.