For several reasons, the North's response to the Civil War was very successful, while the South's defeat shattered most of the Confederate States economically.
For the North: President Lincoln's Sect of War Edwin Stanton concentrated on equipping and supplying munitions and supplies for the Union troops, which served to build the North's industrial base while providing employment for hundreds of thousands. The railroad system also expanded, and the new trackage and rolling stock used to fuel America's post-war expansion. Equally important is that other than Gettysburg, the Civil War was fought in the South.
The South suffered damage that took generations to overcome. With the war being fought in the Confederate States, the destruction to industry and property was enormous. The advancing Union armies ripped up the railroads, burned factories, and the Union naval blockade kept the South from trading it's cotton to the UK for arms and munitions. The pre-war South was an agricultural economy, based primarily on cotton picked and processed by cheap slave labor, and Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation halted that. Additionally, when the Confederates declared their independence, they did not have a viable currency, which other countries (and finally most Southerners) refused to accept.
Ok lets think about this… Pearl Harbor!
The world responded to the mjor forms of world economies to the great depression by watching the stock marketmore carefully. Everything was monitored while recovering from the great depression. you couldn't buy an endless supply of items you needed. The products sold had limits on the amounts you could purchase. It changed the life of people in many ways.
the government in Afghanistan was simply unorganized, and the people did not respond to the governments orders. it is also a country blinded by strong religious beliefs. God is their leader, not their president. a perfect place to hide terrorists.
the brain cells makes your respond to electrocution
how did each of them respond to the challenges facing the united states
The gold standard is considered bad for modern economies because it limits the flexibility of monetary policy, constrains economic growth, and can lead to deflationary pressures. Additionally, it can create instability in the financial system and make it difficult for governments to respond to economic crises effectively.
Market economies respond by increasing the costs of goods that are highly demanded. They also increase production for the items.
The willingness of the state governments to respond to the citizens
I dont no
The gold standard often led to deflationary pressures, as the supply of money was tightly linked to gold reserves, limiting economic growth during periods of increased demand. It also made economies more vulnerable to external shocks; for instance, a country could face severe economic distress if its gold supply diminished. Furthermore, the rigidity of the gold standard restricted governments' ability to implement monetary policy, making it difficult to respond to recessions or financial crises effectively.
resistance stage
because they want to help people
Ok lets think about this… Pearl Harbor!
The Union's industrial and economic capacity soared during the war as the North continued its rapid industrialization to suppress the rebellion. In the South, a smaller industrial base, fewer rail lines, and an agricultural economy based upon slave labor made mobilization of resources more difficult.
They added liberal ideas to their governments
If the Muslim extremists successfully bomb the English defense league EDI rally in London, the UK and its allies are likely to respond and take them out totally.
for patients suffering from severe depression or such psychotic disorders as schizophrenia, although some analysts have successfully treated patients with psychoses.