When you put the armor at an angle, the thickness is increased due to the fact that it is sloped as opposed to plumb.
The US Lost somewhere between 50-100 M1 Abrams where as the British lost 0 Challenger 1 Tanks.
Some of the long - term effects of the World War 1 tanks were that the future models had to be upgraded to reduce the weaknesses of the earlier tanks. These days, tanks can move faster and have thicker armor.
The US tanks used by Israel in the 1973 war with Egypt had greater size, thicker armor and smaller guns than the Soviet tanks used by Egypt.
Armor & Gun=Tank Only Armor=Armored Personnel Carrier Only Gun=Self Propelled Gun Nearly (close to & counting license built copies by other nations) 100,000 T54/T55 medium tanks have been built. Approximately 50,000 M4's & 50,000 T34's were built (and many still exist today in foreign armies). Discounting the thousands of M60's, T62's, T64's, T72's, T'80's, Centurions, Pattons, Leopards, Abrams, there are probably 1/2 million tanks existing in the world...operational and non-operational, in museums and in the field.
In WW 1, the armor on tanks was not THAT thick, and a heavy machine gun with armor piercing ammuntion COULD disable a tank. They were NOT invulnerable.
Depends on what tank you are referring to. The M1A2 Abrams tank has 120 mm (4.72 inches) of armour.
The M26 Pershing tank had armor 102 mm thick on the front of the hull, and 76 mm thick on the sides of the hull. The turret was protected by 102 mm of armor (the same as the hull), while the mantlet (gun shield) for the 90 mm main gun was up to 114 mm thick. The M26 Pershing was one of the only Allied tanks during WWII with thick enough armor to take a direct hit from the German 8.8 cm anti-tank gun and survive.
Tanks sunk easily in mud, for they were so heavy and large. The armor plating was also very thick and dense.
Well I'm not entirely sure but the Russian T-72 has 12 inch thick frontal armour however the M1A1 Abrams uses composite materials equivalent to 24 inches. The thickness no longer matters on a tank there are equally strong materials such as that found on the M1A1 Abrams.
The "tank battalion" is no more. In the new modular heavy division (which contains three minidivisions called Brigade Combat Teams), there are two Combined Arms Battalions per BCT. Each CAB contains two mechanized infantry companies running M-2 Bradley Infantry Fighting Vehicles and two Armor companies running M-1 Abrams tanks. Each armor company has fourteen tanks in it...so, a Combined Arms Battalion contains 28 tanks.
Panzer=Armor=tanks. Automobile makers generally produce tanks.
That information is classified.
nsma,dnad
Most likely the M1 Abrams
In terms of armor i'd say the British Challenger II tank But in terms of firepower i think it is Equal to USA's Abrams tank Both tanks use the Chobham armor but Challenger II uses a more advance class of chobham armor http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Challenger_2
those arrows are to separate the tanks from other companys, since all m1 abrams look the same the arrows tell what company that tank belongs to. you will see different style arrows on tanks of different companys