The compromise was not fair because it often favored one group over another, leading to significant imbalances in representation or rights. For example, in political contexts, compromises may have disproportionately benefited powerful or majority factions while marginalizing minorities. Additionally, the terms of the compromise might have ignored or minimized the needs and voices of those most affected, perpetuating existing inequalities. Ultimately, such compromises can entrench systemic injustices rather than promote equitable solutions.
The need to find a fair solution.
So there would be a fair say in deciding things in Congress. And So That They Would Have Fair Life Skill To Life Up To
They made the Missouri Compromise and the Compromise of 1850.
The delegates settled the dispute over voting during the Constitutional Convention by establishing a compromise known as the Great Compromise or Connecticut Compromise. This agreement created a bicameral legislature, with the House of Representatives based on population and the Senate granting equal representation to each state. This balanced the interests of both larger and smaller states, providing a fair voting system while ensuring that all states had a voice in the legislative process.
Compromise of 1787 (the Great Compromise)
the three fifths compromise was not fair
the great compromise wasnt fair, but it was better than they already had.
no that's what makes it a compromise
i dont think so because a compromise means that bot or all sides agree on it and that doesnt mean it is fair
Basically the Missouri Compromise of 1850 was a fair compromise. One problem for Northern abolitionists was that the Compromise ushered in the Fugitive Slave Act. They were outraged that the new compromise included this law.
The need to find a fair solution.
No. Slavery is no longer legal in America, therefore dismissing the compromise which stated that slaves were counted as 3/5th of a person regarding representation and taxation for states.
Well The compromise of the constitution was not fair because the other signers of the constitution said that a states number of congress members should be based on the states population and the other signers wanted all the states number of congress to be the same
I think it may be the great compromise.
yes because it gave the church the right to appoint bishops
You can work out a price with the sitter and ask them what they usually get paid. You should compromise on a price that is fair to both of you.
Yes, George Read supported the Great Compromise during the Constitutional Convention of 1787. He was a proponent of balancing the interests of both large and small states, which the compromise aimed to achieve by creating a bicameral legislature. This compromise established proportional representation in the House of Representatives and equal representation in the Senate, which aligned with Read's views on ensuring fair representation for all states.