The British maintained a standing army in the American colonies primarily through the use of military garrisons, which were stationed in strategic locations to exert control and enforce British laws. Additionally, the presence of troops was justified as necessary for protecting colonial settlers from external threats, such as Native American tribes. The British government also financed the army through taxes and trade revenues, aiming to ensure loyalty and suppress dissent among the colonists. However, this military presence often fueled resentment and contributed to rising tensions that eventually led to the American Revolution.
the colonies paid tax to british but had no repersenatives there
The American Revolution transformed thirteen British colonies into fourteen states.
Salutary neglect
No. It was a good deal for British merchants and manufacturers but it had no advantage for the American colonists.
hoe
the colonies paid tax to british but had no repersenatives there
American colonies' break from British rule
the british
The American Revolution was the war between the thirteen colonies and British mercantilism.
Salutary neglect
The laws parliament passed increase British control in the American colonies since they lowered taxes.
England wanted to hold on to the American colonies primarily for economic reasons, as the colonies provided valuable resources, raw materials, and a market for British goods. The colonies also represented a strategic advantage for expanding British influence and trade in North America. Additionally, the British government sought to maintain control over colonial governance and taxation, as the colonies contributed to the empire's overall wealth and power. Ultimately, losing the colonies would have diminished Britain's global stature and economic interests.
The American Revolution transformed thirteen British colonies into fourteen states.
Salutary neglect
Salutary neglect
The thirteen British-American colonies were part of the North American continent. They were never considered to be a separate continent.
No. It was a good deal for British merchants and manufacturers but it had no advantage for the American colonists.