In Mesopotamia, citizens were generally organized into a hierarchical society with distinct social classes, including nobles, commoners, and slaves. While free citizens had certain rights and could own property, their treatment varied significantly based on their social status and wealth. The ruling class often had privileges and power, while commoners faced heavy taxation and labor demands. Additionally, laws like the Code of Hammurabi established specific rights and responsibilities, reflecting both protection and control over the populace.
that the wealthy were treated better then the poor
Not good
They were treated as subordiante or second-class citizens.
the same you retarde
Mesopotamia, often regarded as one of the world's earliest civilizations, did not promote political rights for all citizens in an egalitarian sense. Social hierarchy played a significant role, with rights and privileges largely dependent on one's class, profession, and gender. While some free citizens, particularly in urban centers, could participate in local governance and hold certain rights, many others, including women and slaves, had limited or no political power. Thus, the political rights in Mesopotamia were not universally accessible.
things
they were treated very well if they were in high class but if they were in low class they were treated very bad
that the wealthy were treated better then the poor
People who were not Jews were treated differently than the Jews in Nazi Germany. Some of the Jews were German citizens but they were treated as Jews.
The citizens of Mesopotamia invented it in circa 3500 B.C.
Not good
They were treated as subordiante or second-class citizens.
it is really bad and they get treated like their servants
citizens
Not so good.
the real question is why do they
sometimes