Civilian government is generally considered better than military government because it promotes democratic principles, such as accountability, human rights, and the rule of law. Civilian leaders are typically elected by the populace, ensuring that governance reflects the will of the people, whereas military governments often rely on force and coercion. Additionally, civilian governments tend to foster political stability and economic development by encouraging civic engagement and participation in decision-making processes. This can lead to more sustainable and inclusive growth compared to the often authoritarian and repressive nature of military rule.
The total number of military and civilian casualties in World War I was over 35 million. There were over 15 million deaths and 20 million wounded ranking it among the deadliest conflicts in human history.
Well, honey, let me break it down for you. Civilian rule is like having a fancy dinner party with etiquette and democracy, while military rule is like a frat party with tanks and uniforms. So yeah, civilian rule is definitely the way to go if you want a society that values freedom and human rights over marching orders and curfews.
The Panamanian General who was charged with drug trafficking, indicted, captured in 1989 during Operation "Just Cause" (at the cost of between 427 and 4000 human lives both civilian and military) and tried, convicted, sentenced and imprisoned in the US.
A military regime is a form of government in which the military controls the political authority, often following a coup d'état that overthrows a civilian government. In such regimes, military leaders may suspend constitutional laws, restrict civil liberties, and exercise power without democratic accountability. These regimes typically prioritize stability and security, sometimes at the expense of political freedoms and human rights. The duration and nature of military rule can vary, ranging from temporary governance to long-term authoritarian rule.
This is not a question, but a statement from a test or worksheet. Wiki will not do your homework, but will give you suggestions if you need help.
The Canadian military is under civilian control to ensure that it remains accountable to elected officials and reflects the values and priorities of Canadian society. This principle, rooted in democratic governance, helps prevent the military from wielding undue influence over politics and maintains a clear separation between military and civilian roles. Civilian oversight fosters transparency, promotes responsible decision-making, and ensures that military actions align with national interests and human rights standards.
Civilian government is generally considered better than military government because it promotes democratic principles, such as accountability, human rights, and the rule of law. Civilian leaders are typically elected by the populace, ensuring that governance reflects the will of the people, whereas military governments often rely on force and coercion. Additionally, civilian governments tend to foster political stability and economic development by encouraging civic engagement and participation in decision-making processes. This can lead to more sustainable and inclusive growth compared to the often authoritarian and repressive nature of military rule.
The total number of military and civilian casualties in World War I was over 35 million. There were over 15 million deaths and 20 million wounded ranking it among the deadliest conflicts in human history.
The military rules by force and not by the will of the people. Military rule is seldom for the good of the people. Civil rights, in fact basic human rights are often none existent under military rule.The military are AUTHORITARIAN in nature.The civilians gives room for public opinion which is lacking in military
The first human being to step onto the moon ... Neil Armstrong ... was a civilian at the time, and still is.
The term for military troops taking over private homes is "military occupation." This practice often involves soldiers being stationed in civilian residences, which can lead to significant disruption and conflict between military personnel and local populations. It is typically viewed as a violation of human rights and international law, particularly in times of peace.
A citizen has the courage to make the safety of the human race their personal responsibility.Robert A. HeinleinA civilian is collateral.Ty Estus Narada
The total number of military and civilian casualties in World War I, was around 37.5 million. There were 16.5 million deaths and 21 million wounded making it the 6th deadliest conflict in human history.
World War I is estimated to have cost around $350 billion in 1914 dollars, which translates to over $4 trillion when adjusted for inflation. This figure includes military expenditures, infrastructure damage, and economic disruptions across the involved nations. Additionally, the war resulted in significant human costs, with millions of military and civilian casualties, which had lasting social and economic implications for decades. The financial burden contributed to economic instability and set the stage for future conflicts, including World War II.
the answer is simple its not even better than civilian rule why do you think that the civilian governors are the ones ruling us now because nobody wanted military governors
civilian rule is better than military rule because there is freedom and peace in the nation better than when the military was ruling us