Civilisation requires a surplus to provide time for civilised activity to be carried out - beyond the daily struggle for food for survive. Settled peoples can produce this surplus of food and time.
Yes, well its the first recorded civilization, there could be others that were destroyed or were not recorded and if you don't count hunter-gatherers as a civilization then yes...
hunters and gatherers They were hunter-gatherers
They were hunter-gatherers and farmers.
Firstly, normally hunters and gatherers are grouped as hunter-gatherers, meaning they're the same. Secondly, the Aztecs were known for their advanced farming methods. Lastly, the Aztecs were both farmers, and hunter-gatherers.
The Yurok tribes were hunter/gatherers.
They were probably nomadic family groups.
hunter-gatherers do not practice agriculture the way complex civilization do.
hunter-gatherers hunter-gatherers hunter-gatherers
Yes, well its the first recorded civilization, there could be others that were destroyed or were not recorded and if you don't count hunter-gatherers as a civilization then yes...
Yes, there were hunter- gatherers in almost every society. Please note that the hunter-gatherers were there before it was Rome. At the time of the Roman Empire, there generally were no hunter-gatherers.
Hunter Gatherers were the people of a civilization that would hunt wildlife and gather or scavenge plants for food. Both for themselves and other people of the society.
Hunter Gatherers were the people of a civilization that would hunt wildlife and gather or scavenge plants for food. Both for themselves and other people of the society.
Some synonyms for hunter-gatherers is foragers.
Yes, hunter-gatherers were Prehistoric people.
Yes, the compound word 'hunter-gatherers' is a noun a word for people.
They didn't. Hunter-gatherers came before farmers.
This area was populated by hunter-gatherers.