The children were taught to be more independent, and to not trust anyone completely
Many children are very much traumatized about the whole situation. Even if they were born after the war, the talk would be bound to come up and everyone would be somehow effected by it; good or bad.I have not heard that children or grandchildren have been traumatised by the Holocaust, but this does not mean that they have not been affected by the Holocaust. Unfortunately no matter what a survivor does, he or she is going to show the effects of the Holocaust to those closest.Generally by compensating or overcompensating for something, if they do not tell their story, then that affect the people around them as much as telling the story. But for a child to then take this and put it onto the next generation is irresponsible.I am aware that institutionally Israel wants people to remember and if these feeling can somehow be kept alive, then it will keep the nation stronger against outsiders, but this is synthetic. It has been said that anyone who was not in the camps cannot understand what it was like. This is true enough, this is not the kind of effect that is passed down to the children, it is the effect of living with someone that has these memories and experiences, that is how the children are effected by the Holocaust. (You could consider it to be like Passover)
it did not last for 10 years. Understanding of the Holocaust however has changed.
There were a few. The invasion of the Soviet Union changed it for the worse, the battle of Kursk changed it for the better.
It forever changed the idea of what human beings are really capable of.
yes, the world has changed, the micro-chip has been invented, so many things have moved on, the economy has to also.
Many children are very much traumatized about the whole situation. Even if they were born after the war, the talk would be bound to come up and everyone would be somehow effected by it; good or bad.I have not heard that children or grandchildren have been traumatised by the Holocaust, but this does not mean that they have not been affected by the Holocaust. Unfortunately no matter what a survivor does, he or she is going to show the effects of the Holocaust to those closest.Generally by compensating or overcompensating for something, if they do not tell their story, then that affect the people around them as much as telling the story. But for a child to then take this and put it onto the next generation is irresponsible.I am aware that institutionally Israel wants people to remember and if these feeling can somehow be kept alive, then it will keep the nation stronger against outsiders, but this is synthetic. It has been said that anyone who was not in the camps cannot understand what it was like. This is true enough, this is not the kind of effect that is passed down to the children, it is the effect of living with someone that has these memories and experiences, that is how the children are effected by the Holocaust. (You could consider it to be like Passover)
Germany's name never changed during the Holocaust.
it did not last for 10 years. Understanding of the Holocaust however has changed.
None
The Holocaust has changed History because it was a time period when there was tense rivalry between countries, there were many Contraction camps and many life's were lost then.
There were a few. The invasion of the Soviet Union changed it for the worse, the battle of Kursk changed it for the better.
By changing what they do.
the holocaust was the killing of six million Jews and 5 million non-Jews. the polish people that escaped to the U.S.A. changed them to be German.
solid to gas
because people haven't changed.
She was murdered at Trelinka in 1942, at the age of 17.
It forever changed the idea of what human beings are really capable of.