Individuals subjected to the slave trade faced brutal treatment, characterized by extreme physical and psychological abuse. They were often forcibly taken from their homes, packed into overcrowded ships under inhumane conditions, and denied basic rights and dignity. Upon arrival, many were sold at auctions, treated as property rather than human beings, and subjected to harsh labor and severe punishment. This dehumanizing experience left lasting scars on individuals and communities.
He didn't really abolish the slave trade as it was stopped in Nelson Mandala's year. but the Slave trade was partly stopped by him.I think you two are mixing up Civil Rights and Apartheid with slavery William Wilberforce and Thomas Clarkson had a lot to do with the abolition of slaveryhe didn't completely stop the slave trade he made it much easyer for black people to walk around and not get treated badly
african slave trade was a horrible time
The effects of the slave trade depended on which side you were on. If you were the slave owner, the slave trade had the effect of providing a cheap labor force to increase production and sales. The slave trade itself provided a business opportunity in the direct sale of this low cost labor force. The growth of the cotton industry and that of many of other agricultural commodities would not have been possible without slave labor. If you were the slave, it had many devastating effects. Slaves had limited free will. They were separated from their families and often forced to work in harsh conditions. The treatment of the slaves depended on their owner. Some were treated better than others.
Who stopped the slave tradethe slave trade sropped in America. And then abollished in England and Pakistan. I think
The 1808 Slave Trade Compromise in the Constitution.
They weren't. A slave was a slave and seen as property.
In West African cultures slaves were treated like people, while in the Atlantic slave trade they were treated like property.
In West African cultures slaves were treated like people, while in the Atlantic slave trade they were treated like property.
because he did not like the way the slaves were treated
they were contently attacked for opposing the slave trade or the encomienda system
In West African cultures slaves were treated like people, while in the Atlantic slave trade they were treated like property.
they were taken through conquest and sold into slave trade where they were treated harshly, they weren't given any rights and were forced to work for no pay.
slave trade
He didn't really abolish the slave trade as it was stopped in Nelson Mandala's year. but the Slave trade was partly stopped by him.I think you two are mixing up Civil Rights and Apartheid with slavery William Wilberforce and Thomas Clarkson had a lot to do with the abolition of slaveryhe didn't completely stop the slave trade he made it much easyer for black people to walk around and not get treated badly
The Atlantic Slave Trade primarily involved the forced transportation of African slaves to the Americas for labor on plantations, while other slave systems existed in different parts of the world throughout history. One key difference is the scale of the Atlantic Slave Trade, which was the largest forced migration of people in history, involving millions of African slaves. Additionally, the Atlantic Slave Trade was heavily racially motivated and institutionalized, creating a system of chattel slavery where slaves were treated as property with little to no rights.
Some slaved would have enjoyed being treated as a well treated slave. However, most people would not want to be treated as a slave at all, because they were still treated less than human.
Commerce and slave trade compromise