Simply by not enlisting. The Romans had no draft or forced military service. The upper classes served as officers because it was a step up to public recognition and it would help them if they had any political ambitions. Everyone likes a politician with a good military record. The lower classes enlisted because the pay was steady, and the promise of either land or a bonus upon retirement.
The military age was 17 to 46. At thebeginningof theprofessionalizationof the army, the career of a soldier was 16 years. Then in was lengthened to 20 years. Therefore, you would retire from the army depending on the age youjoined If youenlistedat the age of 17 you would bedischargedwhen you were 37.
the Romans had an army to concur land and make there empire stronger.
You would have to be more specific as to what Roman policies you mean. The Romans had policies for taxation, class, trade, marriage, the army---the list goes on.You would have to be more specific as to what Roman policies you mean. The Romans had policies for taxation, class, trade, marriage, the army---the list goes on.You would have to be more specific as to what Roman policies you mean. The Romans had policies for taxation, class, trade, marriage, the army---the list goes on.You would have to be more specific as to what Roman policies you mean. The Romans had policies for taxation, class, trade, marriage, the army---the list goes on.You would have to be more specific as to what Roman policies you mean. The Romans had policies for taxation, class, trade, marriage, the army---the list goes on.You would have to be more specific as to what Roman policies you mean. The Romans had policies for taxation, class, trade, marriage, the army---the list goes on.You would have to be more specific as to what Roman policies you mean. The Romans had policies for taxation, class, trade, marriage, the army---the list goes on.You would have to be more specific as to what Roman policies you mean. The Romans had policies for taxation, class, trade, marriage, the army---the list goes on.You would have to be more specific as to what Roman policies you mean. The Romans had policies for taxation, class, trade, marriage, the army---the list goes on.
Yes.
its simple not a good enough army unlike the romans who in my opinion the romans are the most powerful army and the best trained
The military age was 17 to 46. At thebeginningof theprofessionalizationof the army, the career of a soldier was 16 years. Then in was lengthened to 20 years. Therefore, you would retire from the army depending on the age youjoined If youenlistedat the age of 17 you would bedischargedwhen you were 37.
He had to,all Russians(guys) need to serve their army for 2 years,if they refuse JAIL. When you get out of jail you will be forced to join and if you refuse it will be a cicle.
The Romans hired foreign mercenaries for their army because as the empire grew they needed the manpower and sometimes they needed the special abilities that the foreigners could bring to their lines.
The Romans spread their power by the strength of their army. It was the army that did the conquering and many times just the threat of the Roman army would cause a would be adversary to negotiate a status for himself as a client king.
It costs you nothing to serve in the Army In fact, as long as you serve, they pay you. But it can be dangerous.
Well they would call them something about a god or an army
he refuse to take bribes in order to raise money for army.
the Romans had an army to concur land and make there empire stronger.
he refuse to take bribes in order to raise money for army.
You would have to be more specific as to what Roman policies you mean. The Romans had policies for taxation, class, trade, marriage, the army---the list goes on.You would have to be more specific as to what Roman policies you mean. The Romans had policies for taxation, class, trade, marriage, the army---the list goes on.You would have to be more specific as to what Roman policies you mean. The Romans had policies for taxation, class, trade, marriage, the army---the list goes on.You would have to be more specific as to what Roman policies you mean. The Romans had policies for taxation, class, trade, marriage, the army---the list goes on.You would have to be more specific as to what Roman policies you mean. The Romans had policies for taxation, class, trade, marriage, the army---the list goes on.You would have to be more specific as to what Roman policies you mean. The Romans had policies for taxation, class, trade, marriage, the army---the list goes on.You would have to be more specific as to what Roman policies you mean. The Romans had policies for taxation, class, trade, marriage, the army---the list goes on.You would have to be more specific as to what Roman policies you mean. The Romans had policies for taxation, class, trade, marriage, the army---the list goes on.You would have to be more specific as to what Roman policies you mean. The Romans had policies for taxation, class, trade, marriage, the army---the list goes on.
People who were not in the army would sometimes have a sword or a dagger.
Actually, he was the commander-in-chief, but he was very proud of his troops, so I would say he was proud to serve in the army.