Answer this quesWhich of the following is an approach a cultural historian would take to the Cuban Missile Crisis?tion…
they had many other allies and would defeat the powers of soviet union leaders, they also had more nuclear weapons.
No one would be able to ask this question, or systems such as this wouldn't exist to ask the question.
there never was a blockade of cuba, if there was a blockade it would probably started a nuclear war.
The Cuban missile crisis.After Fidel Castro led a successful revolt to sieze power in Cuba in 1959 he was courted and mentored buy the Soviet Union, who then secretly installed armed rocket silo's in Cuba Pointed at the USA from less than 100 miles away. It did not take the US, under J F Kennedy, to the discover them. The Soviets were told to remove them or else. The world waited with bated breath. Then the Soviets removed them.
Answer this quesWhich of the following is an approach a cultural historian would take to the Cuban Missile Crisis?tion…
Answer this quesWhich of the following is an approach a cultural historian would take to the Cuban Missile Crisis?tion…
Answer this quesWhich of the following is an approach a cultural historian would take to the Cuban Missile Crisis?tion…
Everyone would be dead. They just shot MISSILES AT YOU.
No. there would have been a war if the nukes were launched
(Apex) Describe the tactics the United States might have used to physically destroy the missiles in Cuba.
Russia would pull the missiles out of Cuba.
A historian might describe the tactics the United States might have used to physically destroy the missiles in Cuba.
they had many other allies and would defeat the powers of soviet union leaders, they also had more nuclear weapons.
The Cuban missile crisis came to and end because Kennedy and Khrushchev made an agreement. In the agreement it stated that if Kennedy were to remove its naval blockade around Cuba and if it removes its missile bases in Turkey, Khrushchev would remove his missile bases from Cuba.
No, the noun phrase is a common noun phrase. The word 'Cuban' is a proper adjective but the term 'Cuban missile crisis' does not rise to the level of a title such as the American Revolution or World War II. The English language is not set in stone, there are many people who would consider 'The Cuban Missile Crisis' to be a proper noun, especially those who may have been personally involved. There is no grammar rule against that.
No one would be able to ask this question, or systems such as this wouldn't exist to ask the question.