With crimes against humanity, genocide, war crimes and mass murder.
Who was in charge of what?
Hitler was in overall command of the SS but Himmler was directly in control of the SS .
he was in charge of the nazi group who where in charge of germany. he was there to give out orders to the ss
Hitler broken several War Laws and breached several Human Rights Laws. If he was alive no, He would be charge of War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity, likely be sentenced to death or sentence 6 Million Life Sentences.
Its actually spelt Führer and it was the people in charge of the German forces. (Not just Hitler)
Can a District Court Prosecutor add a misdemeanor charge to a felony charge in Michigan just on hearsay and without any evidence? I always assumed that only a Circuit Court could add additional charges after all evidence has been presented to the court.
To contact the prosecutor in charge of this case, you can reach out to the district attorney's office handling the case and ask to speak with the assigned prosecutor. You may be able to find their contact information on the court's website or by calling the district attorney's office directly.
Not clear what is being asked. The "formal charge." (??)
Yes
No one was in charge of Hitler, he was the head of government in Germany at the time of World War 2.
Who was in charge of what?
In the US, a charge of conspiracy to commit murder can be lodged even if the "murder" never happened. Of course, the prosecutor would want a high level of evidence to make this charge.
Hitler.
If they found whatever it was they were looking for, they will put it together with the any other evidence - present it to the prosecutor to determine if they have a prosecutable case. If the prosecutor feels that they have enough to charge you, you will then be charged.
Germany
No. Any such action should be reported to the state attorney general.If the defendant has already been sentenced, then the case is adjudicated, completed, finished, over, done with.It would be an impossibility for a prosecutor to alter the entire preceding case and change the charge (after-the-fact) for which the defendant has already been tried and sentenced.If they wished to charge the adjudicated defendant with a NEW offense, then that avenue is open to him.
IF WE ARE TALKING ABOUT A CRIMINAL CASE - If the police officer(s) were able to present sufficient proof to the prosecutor to merit and sustain the charge, the case COULD still go forward. The complainant would be subpoenad to the next hearing. -OR- the prosecutor could Nolle the charge with an explanation of 'lack of prosecution.'