Both were severe in different ways but more causalities were suffered in The European Front. It all depends on how you mean it. It's different depending on if you mean damage or deaths,etc.
Worse than the back line
Western, the had the Battle of Verdun and Somme which were the worst battles of WWI.
Names of the holocaust
Honestly, by whom? There are some reasons that WW1 couldbe considered "worse", but you need to be specific about your measuring stick - that is, what do you mean by "worse"?
no it was not they made this world a worse place
Worse than the back line
Western, the had the Battle of Verdun and Somme which were the worst battles of WWI.
it can pollute water, air, the the environment worse and worse.
Your shocks are getting worse.
Sadly it is getting worse in the whole world.
Names of the holocaust
The world would be worse because we would not have good music to listen to
Honestly, by whom? There are some reasons that WW1 couldbe considered "worse", but you need to be specific about your measuring stick - that is, what do you mean by "worse"?
In General WW2 was worse in amount of casaulties, areas of fighting, technology advancements but I'm sure there are some areas where WW1 was worse that WW2.
The world, in my opinion would be a lot worse because some people love his books.
pandemic is worse in the less developed world as they can not afford any medicines so the diseases spread more easily
WWII.