0
What else can I help you with?
What issue did Daniel Webster and Robert hayne argue in the Webster-hayne debate?
Hayne, a politician during Jackson's presidency, raised many issues about State's rights and Slavery. Some of his comments revolved around the tariff of 1828. He said the Tariff, "was producing a spirit of jealousy and distrust" (Meacham 127).
What was Webster-Hayne Debate?
Derpyderp
What do you think Sen Daniel Webster of Massachusetts and Sen Robert Y Hayne of South Carolina might both agree on in the famous 1830 Webster-Hayne debate?
In the 1830 Webster-Hayne debate, both Sen. Daniel Webster and Sen. Robert Y. Hayne might have agreed on the importance of the Union and the need for a strong national government to maintain it. Despite their differing views on states' rights and federal authority, they likely recognized that the stability and unity of the nation were paramount in addressing the challenges of the time, including economic issues and sectional tensions. Additionally, both senators acknowledged the significance of constitutional interpretation in guiding governance and policy.
The Webster-Hayne debate was over the?
right of states to nullify federal laws
Debated Webster about states rights?
Senatod Robert Hayne of South Carollina
Who argued in the Webster Hayne Debate?
The Webster-Hayne Debate was between a man named Daniel Webster and a man named Robert Hayne.
Who challenged Robert Hayne in a senate debate on states' rights?
Daniel Webster
Where was Daniel Webster position of nullification?
Daniel Webster strongly opposed nullification and believed that the federal government was above the states. This is made clear in the Webster-Hayne Debate of 1830, where Webster argued against pro-nullification South Carolina senator Robert Hayne.
The 1830 debate between Senators Daniel Webster and Robert Hayne focused on?
slavery
What did senators Robert hayne of South Carolina and Daniel Webster of Massachusetts debate in congress in the Webster-hayne debate in 1830?
whether or not states had the right to nullify a federal law (ﾉ◕ヮ◕)ﾉ*:･ﾟ✧
In the Webster-Hayne debate Daniel Webster argued that?
In the debate, Webster argued that states did not have the power to nullify a federal law. He also argued that states could not secede from the Union. Daniel Webster held several offices throughout his career, including Senator from Massachusetts.
What did senators Robert hayne of South Carolina and Daniel Webster of Massachusetts debate in Congress in the Webster hang debate in 1830?
In the Webster-Hayne debate of 1830, Senators Robert Hayne and Daniel Webster engaged in a heated discussion primarily centered around states' rights versus federal authority. Hayne argued for the rights of states to nullify federal laws and emphasized the importance of state sovereignty, while Webster defended the supremacy of the federal government and the Union. The debate highlighted the growing sectional tensions in the U.S. and set the stage for future conflicts over states' rights and federal power. Ultimately, Webster's eloquent defense of the Union and national unity resonated strongly, shaping public opinion at the time.
Silver-tongued South Carolina senator who defended nullification in a famous debate of 1830?
Robert Y. Hayne
Silver tongued South Carolina senator who defended nullification in a famous debate of 1830?
Robert Y. Hayne
What issue did Daniel Webster and Robert hayne argue in the Webster-hayne debate?
Hayne, a politician during Jackson's presidency, raised many issues about State's rights and Slavery. Some of his comments revolved around the tariff of 1828. He said the Tariff, "was producing a spirit of jealousy and distrust" (Meacham 127).
What did senators Robert hayne of South Carolina and Daniel Webster of Massachusetts in congress in the Webster hayne debate in 1830?
whether or not states had the right to nullify a federal law (ﾉ◕ヮ◕)ﾉ*:･ﾟ✧
The Webster-Hayne debate of 1830 centered on the subject of presidential veto power state nullification of federal laws reform of the scandalous spoils system the morality of slavery?
The Webster-Hayne debate of 1830 focused on the issue of state nullification of federal laws. Daniel Webster argued against the idea, emphasizing the supremacy of the federal government and the importance of maintaining a strong union. Robert Hayne, on the other hand, supported nullification as a means for states to protect their interests and limit federal power.
