Yes, a serf is considered a type of unfree laborer in historical societies, similar to a slave but with some legal rights and ties to the land they worked on.
Serf/slave
No. Guild people were craftsmen and usually made things. A serf was a slave and on a different lower social level.
A serf was a slave. Most slaves were taken in war or sold to pirates who sold them into slavery.
its a slave to do all the house work. im not really sure though
No benefits, no rights. They were slaves. Serf is the latin word for slave.
a slave
Vassal Serf is the latin word for slave
It is Latin for slave.
Serf/slave
The serf. He was a slave.
a serf helped a vassal because the serf came with the vassals land and that helped him with the land and any other needs for land he was not a slave but one step above the slave
Your question is not entirely correct in its premise; a serf is not a slave and does not have an owner. A serf is a subject of a land owner whom the serf would address as lord.
Bedroom Serf
Some people would say slave, but that is not really correct because a slave could be sold, and a serf could not. Also, a slave had to do whatever told, but a serf simply had to fulfill obligatory duties. A villein was very like a serf, except that a villein lived in town, but a serf was agricultural. A cotter was very like a serf, but we really do not have other information on what a cotter was. It is thought that the cotter was technically free to leave the land, but this is speculation.
The word "serf" means slave and a monk was of the clergy. They were different people with different stations in life.
A serf worked because he was a slave and did what he was told to do.
To work for the lord or manor and fight when there was a war. A vassal was a serf and the word "serf" is Greek for slave.