A city-state would be easier to rule because of its smaller size.
he tried to av s-e-x
Akkadian Empire under Sargon united Mesopotamia under his singular rule. His Empire was preceded by the Sumerian civilization of city-states that had existed prior to, during, and after his rule from the early 3rd millennium BCE
The One Responsible For the end of the Roman Empire is Diocletian. Diocletian Ended the Roman Empire By Splitting the Roman Empire Into West and East. Diocletian thought it would make it easier to rule. Diocletian Gave The East to His Trusted Friend. The Empire Fell Because The West Was Captured by different barbaric groups and tribes. The East Turned into The Byzantine Empire With The Capitol City Of Constantinople. The Empire was Successful until the 1400's. The Empire Was Taken Over. And Made Into A Country That Is Now Know As Turkey.
The Ottoman Empire spanned much more than just the city of Bethlehem. Bethlehem was under the rule of the Ottoman Empire from 1517 to the early 1900s.
The Babylonian Empire
Sparta did not rule an empire. Sparta was a Greek city-state.
A city-state may be easier to rule due to its smaller size and more manageable population, allowing for direct governance and closer relationships between leaders and citizens. In contrast, an empire, with its vast territories and diverse cultures, often requires complex administrative systems and can face challenges in maintaining control and unity. However, the effectiveness of governance ultimately depends on the leadership and the specific context of the state or empire in question.
Diocletian divided the empire in order to make it easier to rule.Diocletian divided the empire in order to make it easier to rule.Diocletian divided the empire in order to make it easier to rule.Diocletian divided the empire in order to make it easier to rule.Diocletian divided the empire in order to make it easier to rule.Diocletian divided the empire in order to make it easier to rule.Diocletian divided the empire in order to make it easier to rule.Diocletian divided the empire in order to make it easier to rule.Diocletian divided the empire in order to make it easier to rule.
No empire established democracy. The first instance of democracy was in the city-state of ancient Athens, which was a republic. Since democracy means rule by the people, the terms democracy and empire are a dichotomy.
False. A land with different territories and people under a single rule is called an empire, not a city-state. City-states are independent sovereign cities and their surrounding territories.
No. The Greeks established nothing as they never had an empire. Ancient Greece was a collection of independent city-states with unity only when a severe crisis loomed. As soon as the crises was over, each city-state resumed its sovereign rule in its own territory. (or fought with another city-state, if things got dull)No. The Greeks established nothing as they never had an empire. Ancient Greece was a collection of independent city-states with unity only when a severe crisis loomed. As soon as the crises was over, each city-state resumed its sovereign rule in its own territory. (or fought with another city-state, if things got dull)No. The Greeks established nothing as they never had an empire. Ancient Greece was a collection of independent city-states with unity only when a severe crisis loomed. As soon as the crises was over, each city-state resumed its sovereign rule in its own territory. (or fought with another city-state, if things got dull)No. The Greeks established nothing as they never had an empire. Ancient Greece was a collection of independent city-states with unity only when a severe crisis loomed. As soon as the crises was over, each city-state resumed its sovereign rule in its own territory. (or fought with another city-state, if things got dull)No. The Greeks established nothing as they never had an empire. Ancient Greece was a collection of independent city-states with unity only when a severe crisis loomed. As soon as the crises was over, each city-state resumed its sovereign rule in its own territory. (or fought with another city-state, if things got dull)No. The Greeks established nothing as they never had an empire. Ancient Greece was a collection of independent city-states with unity only when a severe crisis loomed. As soon as the crises was over, each city-state resumed its sovereign rule in its own territory. (or fought with another city-state, if things got dull)No. The Greeks established nothing as they never had an empire. Ancient Greece was a collection of independent city-states with unity only when a severe crisis loomed. As soon as the crises was over, each city-state resumed its sovereign rule in its own territory. (or fought with another city-state, if things got dull)No. The Greeks established nothing as they never had an empire. Ancient Greece was a collection of independent city-states with unity only when a severe crisis loomed. As soon as the crises was over, each city-state resumed its sovereign rule in its own territory. (or fought with another city-state, if things got dull)No. The Greeks established nothing as they never had an empire. Ancient Greece was a collection of independent city-states with unity only when a severe crisis loomed. As soon as the crises was over, each city-state resumed its sovereign rule in its own territory. (or fought with another city-state, if things got dull)
they made the people understand each other and easier to rule the empire
Empire
he tried to av s-e-x
The Mali Empire was the major African city that became prominent under the Mali rule.
As Augustus was Roman emperor, he ruled the Roman empire from the city of Rome.
the roman empire lasted 500 years