It depends on what you mean by "better." There is no evidence that indicates crime would go down if guns were banned. People were killing, crippling, and robbing each other LONG before guns existed.
the machine guns
Yes, they did have machine guns in WW2
because their guns got dirty
guns
Germany had thirty to forty different weapons in World War I. Some of these were artillery, pistols, special weapons such as a flame thrower, machine guns and ships.
The world would be no better off without guns, just people who use them and do not take the privilege seriously and hurt someone who leave it unlocked. There are so many weapons besides guns…knives that cause just as horrific results. The world would be better off if it just lived in Peace with one another and learned Maslows hierarchy of needs instead of all the religious dogma that appears to only work on Sundays.
Please explain your question better, there are many different types of "guns" that were involved in world war two.
Without
Impossible to answer without a time frame.
No, the world was better for having her.
Yess !! It was much better
no because without fractions we would have no accuracy
Yes, machine guns are better than Gatling guns because they fire more bullets faster than Gatling guns. Gatling guns need to have bullets and have to be hand cranked at the same time but machine guns does not need to be hand cranked. Machine guns only need bullets.
usually fake guns, powdered guns, or guns without any bullets
It would be a better world to live in, that's for sure.
Better
Guns are better than swords. Swords are USELESS. They aren't use anymore because we have guns which are better and more advanced weapon. Swords have been in the time of gladiators, vikings, and ninjas. Today, we use guns and NOT swords because guns are a more effective and lethal weapon.Swords are USELESS. They suck and will LOSE against a Gun. Guns are BETTER. And whoever say Swords are Better, They Suck Balls.