A history book about the Five Good Emperors of Rome is typically considered a secondary source. This is because it interprets, analyzes, and synthesizes information from primary sources, such as inscriptions, letters, and contemporary accounts from that era. Secondary sources aim to provide a broader context and understanding of historical events and figures rather than being direct evidence from the time.
I have not read the book. However, in history Claudius adopted Nero.
IN a book titled IMPACT, it states that Agustus was a good emperor while Caligula and Nero were bad emperors and weak.
Yes, there were many rivers in the Roman territories. In fact, if you look at the map in your history book, you will see that the city of Rome is built on the banks of the Tiber river.
As the empire rose, Byzantine emperors and the pope often clashed. Byzantine emperors took interest in religion and considered themselves the final authority on religion issues while popes, however, insisted that they had ultimate say on such matters. (insisted they had a "say-so" a.k.a. "opinion" on the situation.) In 1504, this led to schism. # How did schism effect the Christian church? Resource: 7th grade history book
Please restate your question. What are the "following"? What are the choices? Why don't you simply read your history book?Please restate your question. What are the "following"? What are the choices? Why don't you simply read your history book?Please restate your question. What are the "following"? What are the choices? Why don't you simply read your history book?Please restate your question. What are the "following"? What are the choices? Why don't you simply read your history book?Please restate your question. What are the "following"? What are the choices? Why don't you simply read your history book?Please restate your question. What are the "following"? What are the choices? Why don't you simply read your history book?Please restate your question. What are the "following"? What are the choices? Why don't you simply read your history book?Please restate your question. What are the "following"? What are the choices? Why don't you simply read your history book?Please restate your question. What are the "following"? What are the choices? Why don't you simply read your history book?
A history book about the Five Good Emperors of Rome is considered a secondary source. It interprets, analyzes, and synthesizes information from primary sources, such as ancient texts, inscriptions, and archaeological findings related to that period. Secondary sources provide context and commentary rather than firsthand accounts of events.
Giovanni Battista Comazzi has written: 'The morals of princes: or, An abstract of the most remarkable passages contain'd in the history of all the emperors who reign'd in Rome' -- subject(s): Accessible book, History
Rome
They are in history book and websites. Look them up: try History Rome for starters.
I have not read the book. However, in history Claudius adopted Nero.
The Emperors Hangman is was Mr.Beaver Calls the White Witch
You can't really do multiple-choice questions on this website. A history textbook could be anything: a book, a text, a history, a nonfiction book ... even a nonliving thing!
A history book is generally considered a secondary source because it analyzes, interprets, or summarizes information from primary sources, such as original documents, artifacts, or firsthand accounts. Secondary sources provide context and analysis of historical events, rather than presenting direct evidence from the time being studied. However, if a history book contains original research or firsthand accounts, it may also include elements of primary sources.
A history book written by taking information from lots of other sources.
A history book written by taking information from lots of other sources.
Charles Isidore Hemans has written: 'Historic and monumental Rome' -- subject(s): Antiquities 'Historic and monumental Rome' -- subject(s): Accessible book, Antiquities 'A history of Ancient Christianity and Sacred art in Italy' -- subject(s): Accessible book, Christian antiquities, Church history 'The story of monuments in Rome and her environs' -- subject(s): Antiquities, Excavations (Archaeology)
A bibliography from a book typically includes the author's name, the title of the book, the publication date, and the publisher. For example: Smith, John. "The History of Ancient Rome." 2005. Penguin Books.