It is not correct to disobey anything good.
but situation is very important thing to disobey law or a rule. prime of law or a rule always be generate as all type of possible circumstances situation can develop themseleves and form a new solution of the problem is not meet only with breaking the rules...
So things did not get out of hand, just why we have law today.
It was because of the people have been scared of the code so they didn't disobey it.
This phrase means that were there is no law, tyranny and oppression will result. It supports the similar concept of "rule of law," where written laws control people's behavior, not the whims of a strongman ruler. It means that the law is the safeguard of our lives, liberty, and property. It is our protector and shield. So again, "where law ends, tyranny begins" means that the law protects people from the dominion of others. Steve in Saint Louis
Rule by a group or family rulers
because Mary wanted to be queen so she got an executor to kill her so Mary could rule England
Not unless you feel strongly enough about it to suffer the consequences for doing so. Another consideration in choosing to disobey a law or a rule is to know that you may be infringing on someone else's rights or property.
The Answer is yes. the Right hand rule, is a rule that can not be broken & must obey the law of Physics. So therefore the right hand rule does apply.
So things did not get out of hand, just why we have law today.
A sentence is...The president must obey the rule of law so he doesn't abuse his power as a ruler.HOPE THIS HELPS
They are added to the Constitution so that you can have new law/rule.
The Lambert-Beer law is not so correct at high concentration.
i dont think so, no one is above the law
Men die, want power, try to get rich, and change their minds. Law stays the same, is consistent through the years and can be applied with other laws.
Rule of law implies that every citizen has to follow the law. It's opposite of the right of kings, where as the gods/god chose the leader so the leader is above all law. Yeah. You're welcome. Good Luck!
when a police officer is directing traffic. When it is unsafe to do so.
dicey's exposition of rule is base on holy misconception. he has not foresee the evolution of system, due to which his thesis not support administrative law. his thesis can also be criticized on following; 1- INHERENT AMBIGUITY:- decision of parliament always based on majority's decision. if so then what about minority. in this sense majority holds arbitrary powers. 2- IF PARLIAMENT ENACTED BAD LAW:- if parliament passes a bad law then is the rule of law consider it a supremacy of law?
Rule Of Law entails that the people of a nation are governed by clear and fair rules, rather than at the discretion and personal exercise of power. Citizens are explicitly told what they can and can't do in the constitution or in laws. With Rule Of Law in place, citizens can expect to be treated fairly by a just government. A basic principle is that government and those who govern are bound by the same fundamental laws that apply to everyone else. The rule of law has three principles. The first states that everyone is equal before the law (so the rich and the rulers of a country do not get preferential treatment). The second states that the law must be accessible to all who are subject to it. This requires that the law be publicly posted so that anyone can see it and no one can claim ignorance of the law as a reason for breaking it. Lastly, the third principal of the rule of law states that everyone has a right to a fair and timely trial. The definition for rule of law is " influence and authority of law within society." The restriction of the arbitrary exercise of power by subordinating it to well-defined and established laws.