The mask worn in the movie V for Vendetta is a face that looks like Guy Fawkes, right down the "imperial". I doubt that Guy Fawkes ever wore a mast that looks like himself.
I believe that the mask is more symbolic, in that V is styling himself after Guy (Guido) Fawkes who was trying to bring down the English government by blowing up parliament. He failed and was executed. In the V movie, he is trying to do a similar thing (albeit for different reasons) ... and even though V dies just like Fawkes, V actually succeeds in blowing up parliament.
they streched him, dislocated his bones, cut him open and burnt his organs in front of him. Then beheaded him and spread his body parts in different locations, to remind people not to commit treason. This is true!
Yes, there are several elements of suspicion surrounding the story of Guy Fawkes and the Gunpowder Plot of 1605. Critics argue that the plot may have been exaggerated or manipulated by the government to justify repressive measures against Catholics in England. Additionally, the involvement of government informants and the circumstances of Fawkes' arrest raise questions about the authenticity of the plot. These factors contribute to ongoing debates about the true motivations and implications of the events surrounding Guy Fawkes.
While Guy Fawkes is often portrayed as a figure with a noble cause due to his involvement in the Gunpowder Plot to blow up the British Parliament, his intentions were tied to a violent attempt to change government policies. He aimed to restore Catholic rule in England, which many would not consider "honest" in the broader sense of political intentions. Throughout history, various individuals have entered Parliament with genuine intentions to serve their constituents, so Fawkes does not represent a unique case. In essence, he is more a symbol of rebellion than of honest political engagement.
No it didn't. There is evidence to say that the signature is so different because he was framed alongside the crime. This also means that the confession cannot be trusted, as it was not signed properly and therefore, the evidence and convictions on it cannot be true.
something to hide the truth. it is usually a costume / fake moustache / wig / mask etc. that can hide a person's true identity. however... you could also say something like: "John tried to disguise the fact that he was cheating on Sarah", which is not referring to a costume, but to an act of devious cunning, or downright lying.
A person cant come back to life but the story behind it sounds like it can be true
toto
Stanly Ipkis is the unfortunate soul who stumbles accross the mask. However the true owner is Loki =3
Recording studios mask singer's true talents and give a false perception to listeners.
True
True
they streched him, dislocated his bones, cut him open and burnt his organs in front of him. Then beheaded him and spread his body parts in different locations, to remind people not to commit treason. This is true!
True
True
True
Yes, there are several elements of suspicion surrounding the story of Guy Fawkes and the Gunpowder Plot of 1605. Critics argue that the plot may have been exaggerated or manipulated by the government to justify repressive measures against Catholics in England. Additionally, the involvement of government informants and the circumstances of Fawkes' arrest raise questions about the authenticity of the plot. These factors contribute to ongoing debates about the true motivations and implications of the events surrounding Guy Fawkes.
Yes he is. It was on MTV last night