0
Is it true that the Emancipation Proclamation received popular support overseas particularly in Britain and France?
Yes, the Emancipation Proclamation received significant support overseas, particularly in Britain and France. Many in these countries viewed it as a moral stance against slavery and a step toward human rights. This support was influenced by the growing abolitionist movements within Britain and France, which aligned with the Proclamation's goals. However, it is important to note that official government support was cautious, as both nations had economic interests tied to the Confederacy.
What else can I help you with?
Who supported Lincoln when he issued the Emancipation Proclamation and who didn't support Lincoln?
Abraham Lincoln received support for the Emancipation Proclamation primarily from abolitionists, many members of the Republican Party, and some northern Democrats who believed in the moral imperative of ending slavery. However, he faced significant opposition from Southern states, which viewed the proclamation as an attack on their way of life, as well as some conservative Democrats and border state leaders who were concerned about the implications for their own slaveholding practices. Additionally, some military leaders were initially skeptical about its impact on the war effort.
What does the emancipation proclamation say about military service for emancipated slaves?
The Emancipation Proclamation, issued by President Abraham Lincoln in 1863, encouraged the enlistment of freed slaves into the Union Army. It declared that "such persons of suitable condition will be received into the armed service of the United States," recognizing the vital role that emancipated individuals could play in the fight against the Confederacy. This policy not only aimed to bolster the Union's military strength but also sought to undermine the Confederate war effort by allowing African Americans to actively contribute to their own liberation.
Why did members of President Lincolns cabinet urge him to wait for before announcing the emancipation of Southern slaves with the understanding of what it would do and could not do?
Up President Lincoln and his first version of an emancipation proclamation began in June of 1862. When he presented his ideas on the proclamation to his cabinet, he received varied opinions. Montgomery Blair believed that an emancipation, who came from a family of slave owners, objected on the grounds it that it might influence the border states to join the Confederacy.Attorney General Bates was also a border state politician and agreed with Lincoln as long as the emancipation made White privilege was maintained, and compulsory resettlement of Blacks outside of US borders was made clear.Secretary of War, Stanton supported the emancipation, even though he was a Democrat and shared his party's distaste for abolition and racial equality.Secretary of the Navy, Welles favored the emancipation on the grounds that if the North did not make use of the slaves, the South would.Secretary of State Seward favored the emancipation but urged a delay in order to have a broader view of its implications.Treasury Secretary Salmon Chase was a radical Republican, yet he questioned the president's constitutional authority to make such a proclamation and he feared that race riots and revolts would cause chaos and danger to the nation.
What did the proclamation invite the freed people to do?
Such persons of suitable condition will be received into the armed services.
What did the Emancipation Proclamation do?
FREED SOUTHERN SLAVESAbraham Lincoln issued the proclamation (first announcing it on Sept. 22, 1862, and putting it into effect on January 1, 1863), declaring slaves free in all areas then in rebellion against the Union. It authorized the Union armed forces to carry this into effect as they took control of areas of the Confederacy. When they received fleeing slaves, they were no longer to return them to their masters. The proclamation freed 3.1 million of the 4 million slaves in the USA. The Proclamation also authorized the Union armies to recruit these freed slaves to fight. A large number joined the Union Army and made a major contribution to the war effort during the final two years of the war.A claim that it "freed no one" (see below) is inaccurate. Yes, it only did so as the Union Army was able to move forward. But that is the same for any law or proclamation --it is a 'dead letter' until backed up by power (sometimes armed force). And this proclamation specifically provided for its own enforcement. In fact, from 1863 through mid-1865 (when on June 19 the order was announced in Texas), the Proclamation was the main instrument by which slaves in the South were actually freed.Note that Lincoln took this step under his "war powers" as Commander-in-chief. He had no general authority under the Constitution to free slaves elsewhere (especially in the border states that had remained loyal to the Union). The criticism of his not freeing slaves in the Union misses this point - the Proclamation could not free these slaves, no matter how much Lincoln might have wanted to.PART OF LARGER PLAN TO FREE ALL SLAVESCritics also ignore the fact that Lincoln & Congress were, even before the Emancipation Proclamation working on Constitutional methods to end slavery throughout the nation. Lincoln, already in 1861, had begun to urge border Union slave states to vote an end to slavery themselves (which some eventually did). His original proposal was "compensated emancipation", providing financial help to states that emancipated their slaves. In fact, Lincoln and Congress had already used this method in April 1862 to free slaves in Washington DC (the one place they had the Constitutional authority to do so!)Lincoln and the Republicans also worked on a method to free all slaves in the Union, as well as to assure that those freed under the Emancipation Proclamation remained free after the war ended (since a court challenge could conceivably reinstate slavery). This was accomplished by means of the 13th amendment to the Constitution in 1865.FOREIGN RELATIONSThe Proclamation was not, at first, highly regarded overseas. Britain was not impressed by it, and stayed its hand at recognizing the Confederacy not so much because of the Proclamation, but because the victory at Antietam suggested a Southern victory was not a certainty. The French government did not really care about the slavery issue or 'bad press', but preferred to recognize the South only after Britain did.DOMESTIC POLITICSOne other effect - in the short term, as Lincoln expected, the Proclamation cost him and his party at home. It contributed to a number of key losses in the 1862 elections. This makes it all the more remarkable that Lincoln chose to announce the plan in September, rather than waiting until after those elections.Claim that it had no real effect :The Emancipation Proclamation merely announced Lincoln's intention to free slaves that it had no power to free. No slaves were freed (not even on paper) until the actual Executive Order was signed over three months later. Even then, it specifically exempted the Slave States that had not seceded (like Kentucky and Maryland). It also specifically exempted any State that had not seceded or that had been captured by Union troops and any county that had been captured by Union troops. In other words, slavery REMAINED LEGAL in all Slave States and Slave Counties that were under Union control. The only places where slavery became illegal was in those States and Counties that didn't recognize the authority of the US government anyway. So, in actual effect, the Emancipation Proclamation freed exactly zero slaves.Though as the North conquered more territory in the South, slavery immediately became illegal in the new States and Counties conquered. But it was the Union Army, not the Emancipation Proclamation, that conquered those States and Counties.(Some argue that some slaves in already-Union-controlled areas were freed immediately upon the issuance of the executive order, and the estimate of the number of slaves thus freed varies between 20,000 and 50,000. If this is, in fact, the case, then the executive order was, in fact, in direct opposition to the Emancipation Proclamation, which exempted all states or parts of states under Union control. So, once again, the Emancipation Proclamation itself freed no one.)The Emancipation Proclamation, in itself, was totally worthless. Moreover, it was nothing more than a political stunt and one of the most dishonest political acts of American history. It was bait to get the States in Rebellion to rejoin the Union, under the promise that they would be allowed to keep their slaves. It even provided a means by which States in rebellion could prove that they were no longer in rebellion (election of representation of the State in the US Congress was "deemed conclusive evidence"). Yet, Lincoln never intended to let any Southern States keep their slaves. It was a classic "bait and switch". Of course, none of the Southern States fell for it.
What is According to the Emancipation Proclamation which opportunities will be provided to former slaves?
According to the Emancipation Proclamation, former slaves were to be "received into the armed services of the United States to garrison forts, positions, stations, and other places, and to man vessels of all sorts in said service." This means that they would have the opportunity to join the military and participate in the defense of the United States.
Why did the first Emancipation Proclamation disturb Union General George B McClellan?
It was in late September that Union General George B. McClellan received the news of Lincoln's first Emancipation Proclamation along with the president's suspension of habea corpus. This was Lincoln's complete repudiation of McClellan's views of the war. McClellan had demanded earlier from Lincoln that slavery would be left alone. Lincoln wanted emancipation. McClellan also had demanded that there be strict limits on military actions against the rights and property of Confederate civilians. Lincoln disagreed.
Who supported Lincoln when he issued the Emancipation Proclamation and who didn't support Lincoln?
Abraham Lincoln received support for the Emancipation Proclamation primarily from abolitionists, many members of the Republican Party, and some northern Democrats who believed in the moral imperative of ending slavery. However, he faced significant opposition from Southern states, which viewed the proclamation as an attack on their way of life, as well as some conservative Democrats and border state leaders who were concerned about the implications for their own slaveholding practices. Additionally, some military leaders were initially skeptical about its impact on the war effort.
What does the Emancipation Proclamation guarantee to former slaves?
It promises only that they " shall be then, thenceforward, and forever free; and the Executive Government of the United States, including the military and naval authority thereof, will recognize and maintain the freedom of such persons, and will do no act or acts to repress such persons, or any of them, in any efforts they may make for their actual freedom." It further promises that they will be received into the military services of the US. The Emancipation Proclamation makes no offer or guarantee of compensation, goods, land, money or mules.
What was the emancipation procimation?
It was a proclamation issued by Lincoln which freed all the slaves in states which were in rebellion (that is, the Confederate states during the Civil War). Lincoln threatened to free the slaves as a way to leverage the Confederacy into rejoining the Union. The Confederates refused. Lincoln followed through on his threat. Despite what many think, the Emancipation Proclamation did not free all slaves, only those in states which had seceded. Slaves in other states had to wait until the adoption of the 13th Amendment before they received their freedom.
Why did members of President Lincolns cabinet urge him to wait for before announcing the emancipation of Southern slaves with the understanding of what it would do and could not do?
Up President Lincoln and his first version of an emancipation proclamation began in June of 1862. When he presented his ideas on the proclamation to his cabinet, he received varied opinions. Montgomery Blair believed that an emancipation, who came from a family of slave owners, objected on the grounds it that it might influence the border states to join the Confederacy.Attorney General Bates was also a border state politician and agreed with Lincoln as long as the emancipation made White privilege was maintained, and compulsory resettlement of Blacks outside of US borders was made clear.Secretary of War, Stanton supported the emancipation, even though he was a Democrat and shared his party's distaste for abolition and racial equality.Secretary of the Navy, Welles favored the emancipation on the grounds that if the North did not make use of the slaves, the South would.Secretary of State Seward favored the emancipation but urged a delay in order to have a broader view of its implications.Treasury Secretary Salmon Chase was a radical Republican, yet he questioned the president's constitutional authority to make such a proclamation and he feared that race riots and revolts would cause chaos and danger to the nation.
What are the ratings and certificates for Malcolm in the Middle - 2000 Emancipation 3-2?
Malcolm in the Middle - 2000 Emancipation 3-2 is rated/received certificates of: Argentina:Atp
What did the proclamation invite the freed people to do?
Such persons of suitable condition will be received into the armed services.
Can a seventeen year old move out of his parents house in Colorado?
Without having received emancipation, no.
What are the ratings and certificates for Stargate SG-1 - 1997 Emancipation 1-3?
Stargate SG-1 - 1997 Emancipation 1-3 is rated/received certificates of: Argentina:13
What are the ratings and certificates for Gruen Planet - 2011 Overseas Owned Beer 1-1?
Gruen Planet - 2011 Overseas Owned Beer 1-1 is rated/received certificates of: Australia:PG
What are the ratings and certificates for House M-D- - 2004 Emancipation 5-8?
House M-D- - 2004 Emancipation 5-8 is rated/received certificates of: Netherlands:12 USA:TV-14
