The justification of revolutionary violence against an oppressor is a complex and contentious issue. It can be argued that when all peaceful means of resistance have been exhausted and the oppressor perpetuates severe injustices, violence may be seen as a necessary response to achieve liberation and justice. However, the moral implications and potential consequences of such actions must be carefully considered, as violence can lead to further suffering and instability. Ultimately, the justification often depends on context, the nature of the oppression, and the goals of the revolutionary movement.
During the revolutionary war, Indian tribes A) first hoped to stay neutral, but man ended up fighting on the bitish side. B) first joined the british but later switched to the revolutionary side. C) participated in violence against both sides D) embraced the revolutionary cause from the onset of hostilities
Leon Trotsky, a key figure in the Russian Revolution, advocated for the use of violence to protect and advance the revolution, particularly through the idea of "permanent revolution." He believed that revolutions needed to be defended against counter-revolutionary forces and that revolutionary violence was sometimes necessary to achieve socialist goals. His thoughts on the subject were influential in the early years of the Soviet Union, particularly in the context of the Civil War and the formation of the Red Army.
because it was a revolution against the king
Pogroms (that is, mob violence against Jews).
violence was directed against representatives of distant authority
It made Ottoman leaders sus of groups that were not Turkish or Muslim. (APEX)
De Beauvoir argues that in some situations, violence may be inevitable as a response to oppressive structures that perpetuate inequality. She suggests that violence can be morally justified when used as a means to resist and challenge systems of oppression that deny individuals their freedom and agency. However, she does not condone violence that is used for purely destructive or oppressive purposes.
The oppressor in World War 1 was Germany. Germany was part of the Central Powers alliance and fought against the Allies who included Britain and the USA.
No. Discrimination is NEVER justified.
Gandhi was against violence
Quakers have always been against wars and violence. So they would have disagreed with any type of killing or war.
me
During the revolutionary war, Indian tribes A) first hoped to stay neutral, but man ended up fighting on the bitish side. B) first joined the british but later switched to the revolutionary side. C) participated in violence against both sides D) embraced the revolutionary cause from the onset of hostilities
Center Against Domestic Violence was created in 1977.
Violence Against Women - journal - was created in 1995.
Campaign Against Domestic Violence was created in 1991.
Stop Violence Against Women was created in 2004.