answersLogoWhite

0

A valid response to the British argument is that while colonists benefited from being part of the empire, they had no direct representation in Parliament and thus could not voice their concerns or influence tax decisions. This lack of representation violated the principle of "no taxation without representation," which was a fundamental grievance for many colonists. Additionally, the economic realities of colonial life, including their own contributions to the empire, suggested that the burden of taxation should be more equitably assessed. Therefore, the colonists argued that their rights as Englishmen were being infringed upon.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

2mo ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What was the colonists' main argument against the Stamp Tax?

the colonists did not want to be taxed directly by parliament


What was the colonists biggest argument about the taxes?

Taxation without representation.


What argument did the colonists use against British taxes?

becuz


Which argument supports the perception of big business leaders as captains of industry?

Industrialists' support for technology benefited the economy.


Which argument supports the perception of big business leader as captains of industry?

Industrialists' support for technology benefited the economy.


Which argument supports the perception of big business leader as 'captains of industry'?

Industrialists' support for technology benefited the economy.


Which argument supports the perception of big business leaders as “captains of industry”?

Industrialists' support for technology benefited the economy.


Which argument supports the perception of big businesses leaders as captains of industry?

Industrialists' support for technology benefited the economy.


Why did the American colonies have the right of Englishmen?

The American colonies had the rights of Englishmen because they were established as British settlements and were subject to English law. The colonists considered themselves subjects of the British Crown and believed they were entitled to the same legal protections and civil liberties as those living in England. This principle was rooted in the tradition of English common law and the idea of natural rights, which fueled their expectations for representation and fair treatment. As tensions grew, these rights became a central argument in their quest for independence.


Which of these supported the British argument that colonists should pay higher taxes?

Many colonists had become wealthy at a time when britian did not have much wealth.


How did the colonists justify their rejection of parliamentary sovereignty?

The colonists' argument has important strengths, but it has its shortcomings and this representation justified Parliament's continuing jurisdiction over them.


What supported the British argument that colonists should pay higher taxes?

Many colonists had become wealthy at a time when Britain did not have much wealth.