No, it's a primary source historical document.
The declaration of independence is primary source
Yes, the Declaration of Independence is considered a documentary source. This type of source is a type of record that were generated by an individual or group that details what was going on in their lives.
True
suggested that people are the source of power
It depends, the format of the source is not what makes it primary or secondary, it is the nature of the source itself. Whether is is in a book, on a respectable website, in a magazine, in a journal, or on a bit of paper has no bearing. What matters is who wrote it and when. Regardless of location, the Declaration of Independence is a primary source, as are many diarys. If you read the Magna Carta online, it is still a primary source. But always take extreme caution with internet souces, because you have much less assurance that they have not altered the original document.
The Declaration of Independence is a primary source because it was created at the time of the events it describes and provides firsthand information about the thoughts and beliefs of the authors.
When researching American independence or almost any founding-period subject, the Declaration of Independence is indeed a primary source. The difference between primary sources and secondary sources hinges on this simple distinction: a primary source is (or was) "there", while a secondary source is (or was) not "there" but instead talks "about" it.
The declaration of independence is primary source
Yes, the Declaration of Independence is considered a documentary source. This type of source is a type of record that were generated by an individual or group that details what was going on in their lives.
True
It would be a primary sourcebecause it is word for word as it was written. In a similar more obscure way, letters written by Adams to Jefferson are primary sources.
The people are the source of government authority
suggested that people are the source of power
The Declaration of Independence is a primary source, but only if you use the original document or a fascimile of the real document. Someone else's paraphrase of it or opinion would be a secondary source.
john Locke
john Locke
It depends, the format of the source is not what makes it primary or secondary, it is the nature of the source itself. Whether is is in a book, on a respectable website, in a magazine, in a journal, or on a bit of paper has no bearing. What matters is who wrote it and when. Regardless of location, the Declaration of Independence is a primary source, as are many diarys. If you read the Magna Carta online, it is still a primary source. But always take extreme caution with internet souces, because you have much less assurance that they have not altered the original document.