Before, during, and after the American Civil War, it can be fairly said that many northern whites (and others) objected to slavery on very simple moral grounds. They opposed the practice within America or anywhere because of what they saw as its inherent wrong: no human being is rightly held in bondage to any other on the basis of supposed racial, ethnic, economic, or any other inferiority.
You have to understand the war had VERY LITTLE to do with slavery.
Hill People
Generally speaking, Northerners and Northern politicians believed that slavery should not be allowed to expand to new territories or new states. Part of their argument was negated in 1857 by a ruling by the US Supreme Court which said slavery was constitutional.
The Free Soil Party members were opposed to the spread of slavery because they believed in a system that was not only economical but moral as well. They believed every human being ought to be judged by his ability and not skin color.
because he believed abolitionists must fight slavery at its source.
The norther opposed to slavery because
Most Free-Soilers objected to slavery because they believed it was morally wrong and violated basic principles of human rights. They also opposed the expansion of slavery into western territories, believing it would threaten opportunities for free labor and economic growth. Additionally, they saw slavery as a threat to the political balance in Congress.
Most of the Northern population believed that on moral and religious grounds, slavery was an evil institution. The Northern economy was not based on slavery, although the cotton from the South was produced by the labor of slaves.
You have to understand the war had VERY LITTLE to do with slavery.
Freelanders objected to slavery because they believed it was morally wrong to enslave another human being, that it violated the principles of equality and human rights. They also argued that allowing slavery to expand into new territories would threaten the economic opportunities of free white laborers.
Abolitionists objected to the Fugitive Slave Law of 1850 because it required citizens in free states to assist in capturing and returning escaped slaves, denying them a chance at freedom. They believed it strengthened the institution of slavery and violated their principles of human rights and justice.
the northern and the south delegates have different ideas about slavery because the southern needed slaves and the northern did not
she believed that there shouldn't be any slavery. She thought this because slavery was a horrible thing
the northern and southern states differed in their attitudes toward slavery because the northern states were against slavery while the southern states were all for slavery, in fact they had slaves. The northern and southern states disagreed about it so much that it caused a war, known as the civil war.
Many southerners objected to the ending of slavery because they saw it as a threat to their economic livelihood, as much of the Southern economy was based on slave labor. Additionally, some believed in the superiority of the white race and viewed slavery as a way to maintain social order. There were also concerns about the loss of political power and privilege that slaveholding conferred upon Southern states.
Because the southern states were economies based on slavery and many in the northern states felt that slavery was wrong.
the northern and southern states differed in their attitudes toward slavery because the northern states were against slavery while the southern states were all for slavery, in fact they had slaves. The northern and southern states disagreed about it so much that it caused a war, known as the civil war.