Nvidia is currently the leader in gpu performance with the GTX 560 I personally have dealt with both companies I tend to stick to Nvidia seeing as about a month ago my Overclocked GTX 8600 died so I decided to buy a Xfx ati raedeon 5770 HD and that was DOA right out of the box so I traded it in for an Nvidia GTX 460 and the second I installed it it worked just fine Nvidia has always had the faster shader clocks allong with core clocks but you can't beat atis for the price I mean the gtx was like $260 while the raedeon was $180 it's always about preference and budget the best manufacturers are gonna be Nvidias actual cards (not like pny's or bfg tech's) or EVGA if ur going Nvidia. If ur going ati then XFX or Asus.
it would come down to hulk and juggernaut. but i choose hulk. sorry juggernaut fans.
hulk, because he can beat them all up. and decides, if you keep attacking him he will get stronger.
Mus vs Cbhs Harding vs st. George's Collierville vs Houston Also there are more St. George's vs briarcrest Ecs vs Harding White station vs melrose Those would be some big rivalries, especially mus vs Cbhs and Harding vs st. George's
Algeria Vs Slovenia Serbia Vs Ghana Germany Vs Australia
The conflict is Man vs. Man as demontrated in Man vs. Society/the government, and Man vs. Self.
nvidia geforce gt525m
MSI NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680. gpuboss . com/gpus/GeForce-GTX-970-vs-GeForce-GTX-680
analysis done here: http://pcgamingcorner.com/wordpress/?p=820
Eh, Dude!! Go with Nvidia 5200 as there is no need to think over it. If you really wanna know why am I saying this then click the link below. It is my whole year experience with Intel X3100 : http://lnk.in/X3100 {if you can't click then paste the code in address ba}.
Performance-wise, the GeForce 9800 GTX should in theory be a little bit better than the Radeon HD 4850 overall (about 10% faster).The GeForce 9800 GTX is much (more or less 47%) faster with regards to texture filtering than the Radeon HD 4850.The GeForce 9800 GTX will be just a bit (more or less 15%) better at full screen anti-aliasing than the Radeon HD 4850, and should be capable of handling higher resolutions more effectively.
Generally the 320M should outperform the HD 5470. Neither can play the more demanding games on anything else than maybe low to medium graphic settings. The only major advantage of the HD 5470 would be it's DX11 support (vs 10.1 on the 320M), which still isn't such a big deal since it probably won't be able to play DX11 games on a level of detail where it would mater. In short, both can be used to play lighter games as well as high definition video and Internet browsing.
The Inspiron 545. Though its processor has a slower clock speed, it is a quad core vs the 545s's dual core. Also, don't quote me on it, but I believe that ATI's HD 3450 is better than Intel's Graphics Media Accelerator 3100. And also, the 545 has a 1tb hard drive, vs the 545s's 750gb hard drive. So the Inspiron 545 is better. - ElectroGoofy
rhino
LevelMatchPasswords16All vs BermudaN/A15All vs NetherlandsCRICKET14All vs CanadaFOOTBALL13All vs ScotlandSPEEDWAY12All vs KenyaBASEBALL11All vs IrelandDAGGY10All vs ZimbabveDINGO9All vs BangladeshCARTMAN8All vs West IndiesCLASSIC7All vs Sri LankaMICKEY6All vs PakistanMCBEAR5All vs New ZealandROCKET4All vs EnglandBGARK3All vs AustraliaMONKEY2All vs IndiaBEEFY1All vs South AfricaTUGGA
Whitebeard
pinhead from hellraiser
mechagodzilla