Because of the position and strength held in society by the local shaman most political leaders have found it expedient to follow a religion, usually the strongest or most vocal. That is not to say that some monarchs, presidents and leaders do not hold strong religious convictions. If they are in a position of such strength some may shun all religions and religious teaching.
It declared that only Protestants could be monarchs in England. Since the monarch was also the religious authority, and Church of England was the national religion, only an Anglican could be the monarch.
Monarch is a Noun.
A constitutional monarch, is a monarch whose powers are limited by a constitution. An absolute monarch (for example Louis XIV of France) will rule without a constitution, investing all powers in themselves as a monarch with little or no bureaucracy, and few restrictions on his actions.
The petition challenged the idea of the divine right of kings, declaring that even a monarch must obey the law of the land. This was a very revolutionary idea in England, because the monarch was deemed a religious authority appointed by God, which gave him a pass from so-called earthly laws.
tolerance is oxygencreated by the heartbreathed by the soulAnswerasdasds Another answer: In my opinion we should tolerate other religions and have religious pluralism. We should do as most religions teach, namely, to love one another. What we should not tolerate in any religion are the extremist elements.
duck
Monarch butterfly. The term "monarch" is not a proper noun, so it should not be capitalized.
no
A secular monarchy is a form of government where a monarch rules in a non-religious capacity, separate from any official religious institution. This means that the monarch's authority and power are derived from sources other than a divine or religious mandate. Examples include constitutional monarchies like those found in the United Kingdom and Japan.
No, because it isnot a propernoun.
In The Matter, Forme and Power of a Common Wealth Ecclesiasticall and Civil, published in 1651, Thomas Hobbes suggested that only a strong ruler could control the instability of society, and that the monarch should also have power over religious faiths and doctrines.
It declared that only Protestants could be monarchs in England. Since the monarch was also the religious authority, and Church of England was the national religion, only an Anglican could be the monarch.
England possessed a unified national state, religious unity, nationalism, and a popular monarch.
Economic and Military is the answer for Nova Net.
Curtsey or bow as a sign of respect.
You should always obey the law. Religious or not.
the monarch butterfly