3/5 compromise
It was a compromise between larger states that wanted congressional representation Gave all states some form of the representation they wanted
The three-fifths compromise showcased the escalating divisions between Northern and Southern states. The issue was over how slaves would be counted for taxation and legislative purposes.
The Three-Fifths Compromise was a compromise between Southern and Northern states reached during the Philadelphia Convention of 1787 in which three-fifths of the enumerated population of slaves would be counted for representation purposes regarding both the distribution of taxes and the apportionment of the members of the United States House of Representatives.
The Three-Fifths Compromise this compromise ment that for every 5 slaves 3 of them would be counted for taxation and representation.
The Great Compromise, also known as the Connecticut Compromise, settled the argument between the large states and the small states during the Constitutional Convention of 1787. Large states favored representation based on population, while small states wanted equal representation for each state. The compromise established a bicameral legislature, with proportional representation in the House of Representatives and equal representation in the Senate. This arrangement balanced the interests of both groups and was crucial for the ratification of the U.S. Constitution.
The Three-Fifths Compromise was a compromise over how slaves would be accounted for when determining population for congressional representation purposes. The conflict was between the Northern and Southern states.
It was a compromise between larger states that wanted congressional representation Gave all states some form of the representation they wanted
The three-fifths compromise showcased the escalating divisions between Northern and Southern states. The issue was over how slaves would be counted for taxation and legislative purposes.
3/5 Compromise
Basically it was a compromise between the larger states that wanted congressional representation to be based on population, and the smaller states that wanted congressional representation to be equal among the states irrespective of population. The compromise resulted in our current form of government with the members of the House of Representatives being apportioned according to population and the members of the Senate being apportioned at two per state.
The Three-Fifths Compromise was a compromise between Southern and Northern states reached during the Philadelphia Convention of 1787 in which three-fifths of the enumerated population of slaves would be counted for representation purposes regarding both the distribution of taxes and the apportionment of the members of the United States House of Representatives.
The Connecticut Compromise -Apex
The Three-Fifths Compromise, settled on in 1787, determined that slaves would count as three-fifths of a person for the purposes of representation and taxation. This decision was a contentious compromise between states with varying numbers of slaves and helped shape the balance of power between states in the federal government.
The Great Compromise of 1787 (or Sherman's Compromise) was proposed by Roger Sherman. The Compromise was an agreement that defined the representation of each state in Congress/the House of Representatives.
It was an agreement between large and small states and a two house legislature.
There was conflict between the least populated states and greatly populated states in terms of representation. If too much representation was given to the big states, the smaller states there would be an imbalance of power. In addition to this, there was also conflict between those who wanted slaves to count for representation power. The result of that conflict was the Three-Fifths Compromise. In many senses, the constitution was a compromise on many fronts.
The Three-Fifths Compromise this compromise ment that for every 5 slaves 3 of them would be counted for taxation and representation.