0
What else can I help you with?
The Kansas-Nebraska Act allowed settlers in each territory to vote whether to allow slavery?
Yes. It sounded reasonable enough, but the only time it was tried (in Kansas), it led to violence and bloodshed.
Who created the conflict that characterized the characterized the kansas territory as bleeding kansas?
The conflict known as "Bleeding Kansas" was primarily created by the contentious debate over the expansion of slavery into the Kansas Territory following the passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act in 1854. This act allowed settlers in those territories to decide whether to allow slavery, leading to violent clashes between pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions. Key figures, such as abolitionist John Brown and pro-slavery advocates, played significant roles in escalating the violence. The struggle represented broader national tensions that ultimately contributed to the Civil War.
What law was replaced by allowing popular sovereignty?
retained the power to replace the legislative with a new legislative
What was nullified by the Kansas-Nebraska Act?
The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 nullified the Missouri Compromise of 1820, which had prohibited slavery in the northern part of the Louisiana Purchase territory. The Act allowed the territories of Kansas and Nebraska to determine for themselves whether they would allow slavery through the principle of popular sovereignty. This led to significant conflict and violence, known as "Bleeding Kansas," as pro-slavery and anti-slavery settlers rushed into the territories to influence the decision.
Where did slavery exist in the US in 1820?
In 1820, politicians debated the question of whether slavery would be legal in the western territories. The Missouri Compromise permitted slavery in the new state of Missouri and the Arkansas Territory but it was barred everywhere west and north of Missouri.
What allowed people in certain areas to determine whether or not their territory would allow slavery?
The Kansas-Nebraska Act allowed people in certain areas to determine whether or not their territory would allow slavery
Who will decide whether slavery would be allowed in a territory under popular sovereignty?
Under popular sovereignty, the decision on whether slavery would be allowed in a territory is typically made by the residents of that territory through a vote or referendum. This allows the people living in the area to determine the status of slavery based on majority rule.
Under popular sovereignty who decides whether slavery would be allowed in a territory?
Under popular sovereignty, the residents of the territory would ultimately decide whether slavery would be allowed. This principle meant that the people living in a particular territory would determine their own laws and institutions, including the decision on the legality of slavery.
What did Stephen a Douglass think about slavery?
Stephen A. Douglas believed in the concept of popular sovereignty, which allowed residents of a territory to decide whether or not to permit slavery. He believed this approach would help avoid conflicts over the issue of slavery in new territories.
The principle of popular sovereignty meant that whether or not a territory allowed slavery would be left up to?
The principle of popular sovereignty meant that the decision regarding whether a territory would allow slavery was left to the residents of that territory. This concept was intended to give the people the power to determine their own laws and governance, including the issue of slavery. It was a significant aspect of the debates leading up to the American Civil War, as it created tensions between pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions. Ultimately, this principle contributed to conflicts like "Bleeding Kansas."
Which term refers to the idea that settlers had the right to decide whether slavery would be legal in their territory?
Popular sovereignty is the term that refers to the idea that settlers had the right to decide whether slavery would be legal in their territory. This concept was a key issue in the lead-up to the Civil War in the United States.
What was Stephen a Douglas is view on slavery?
Stephen A. Douglas believed in the concept of popular sovereignty, which allowed individual territories to decide for themselves whether to allow or ban slavery. He supported the idea that the people in each territory should have the right to determine their own stance on this issue, rather than having a federal mandate imposed on them.
According to the idea of popular sovereignty which of the following would decide whether slavery would be allowed in a territory?
According to the idea of popular sovereignty, the residents of a territory would decide whether slavery would be allowed through a vote or referendum. The principle is based on the belief that the power and legitimacy of the government stem from the consent of the people living in that area.
Which was an example of popular sovereignty the principle in the mid 1800s that allowed residents of each territory to decide whether they wanted to legalize slavery in their area?
Kansas - Nebraska act
What does popular sovereignty mean in regards to the spread of slavery into territories?
Popular sovereignty is the idea that the residents of a territory should have the right to decide for themselves whether to allow slavery. This concept was influential in the debate over the spread of slavery into new territories during the mid-19th century in the United States, particularly with the passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act in 1854 which allowed for popular sovereignty in those territories.
What was an example of popular sovereignty principle in the mid-1800s that allowed residents of each territory to decide whether they wanted to legalize slavery in their area?
The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854
People living in a territory had the right to decide by voting if slavery be allowed?
Popular sovereignty is the principle that residents of a territory have the right to decide whether slavery should be permitted through a direct vote. It was a compromise proposed as part of the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 to settle the debate over the extension of slavery into new territories.
