Popular sovereignty
Yes. It sounded reasonable enough, but the only time it was tried (in Kansas), it led to violence and bloodshed.
retained the power to replace the legislative with a new legislative
In 1820, politicians debated the question of whether slavery would be legal in the western territories. The Missouri Compromise permitted slavery in the new state of Missouri and the Arkansas Territory but it was barred everywhere west and north of Missouri.
the sovereignty of each state, known as popular sovereignty
Kansas became a center of controversy over slavery due to the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, which allowed settlers in those territories to decide for themselves whether to allow slavery through popular sovereignty. This led to violent conflicts known as "Bleeding Kansas," as pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions flooded into the territory to influence the decision. The struggle highlighted the deep national divisions over slavery, making Kansas a symbolic battleground for the broader conflict that would ultimately lead to the Civil War.
The Kansas-Nebraska Act allowed people in certain areas to determine whether or not their territory would allow slavery
Under popular sovereignty, the decision on whether slavery would be allowed in a territory is typically made by the residents of that territory through a vote or referendum. This allows the people living in the area to determine the status of slavery based on majority rule.
Under popular sovereignty, the residents of the territory would ultimately decide whether slavery would be allowed. This principle meant that the people living in a particular territory would determine their own laws and institutions, including the decision on the legality of slavery.
Stephen A. Douglas believed in the concept of popular sovereignty, which allowed residents of a territory to decide whether or not to permit slavery. He believed this approach would help avoid conflicts over the issue of slavery in new territories.
Popular sovereignty is the term that refers to the idea that settlers had the right to decide whether slavery would be legal in their territory. This concept was a key issue in the lead-up to the Civil War in the United States.
Stephen A. Douglas believed in the concept of popular sovereignty, which allowed individual territories to decide for themselves whether to allow or ban slavery. He supported the idea that the people in each territory should have the right to determine their own stance on this issue, rather than having a federal mandate imposed on them.
According to the idea of popular sovereignty, the residents of a territory would decide whether slavery would be allowed through a vote or referendum. The principle is based on the belief that the power and legitimacy of the government stem from the consent of the people living in that area.
Kansas - Nebraska act
Popular sovereignty is the idea that the residents of a territory should have the right to decide for themselves whether to allow slavery. This concept was influential in the debate over the spread of slavery into new territories during the mid-19th century in the United States, particularly with the passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act in 1854 which allowed for popular sovereignty in those territories.
The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854
Lincoln argued that it was wrong to decide whether to allow slavery in a state or territory by voting
Popular sovereignty is the principle that residents of a territory have the right to decide whether slavery should be permitted through a direct vote. It was a compromise proposed as part of the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 to settle the debate over the extension of slavery into new territories.