answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The USA hoped to end the war with Japan sooner, rather than the wearying business of capturing more and more islands at great cost to the manpower of the American armed forces. And indeed that's what happened, Japan surrendered a few days after the second A-bomb was dropped on Nagasaki.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

To save American lives by ending the war and avoiding an invasion

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

To end the war with Japan .

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: The reasoning behind America's decision to drop atomic bombs on Japan was that?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about General History

What was the reasoning behind bombarding the enemy before a charge?

referring to the battle of gettysburg in 1863?


What is the secondary-story behind the dropping of the atomic bombs?

See website: Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki


What documents influenced the way government was established following creation of the Constitution?

The Constitution offered a framework for establishing the new government, and the Federalist Papers explained the reasoning behind the Constitution.


What is the history behind the name of technetium?

Coined in 1947, the term identifies a chemical element with symbol Tc and atomic number 43.


What did rerf do to help japan after the atomic bombs?

Almost immediately following the end of World War II, Americans began to question the use of the atomic bomb and the circumstances surrounding the end of the Pacific War. More than half a century later, books and articles on the atomic bomb still provoke storms of debate among readers and the use of atomic weapons remains a sharply contested subject. As the 1995 controversy over the Enola Gay exhibit at the Smithsonian's National Air and Space Museum revealed, the issues connected with the dropping of the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki continue to touch a sensitive nerve in Americans. Among scholars, disagreement remains no less heated. But, on the whole, this debate has been strangely parochial, centering almost exclusively on how the U.S. leadership made the decision to drop the bombs. There are two distinct gaps in this historiography. First, with regard to the atomic bombs, as Asada Sadao in Japan correctly observes, American historians have concentrated on the "motives" behind the use of atomic bombs, but "they have slighted the effects of the bomb." Second, although historians have been aware of the decisive influence of both the atomic bombs and the Soviet entry into the war, they have largely sidestepped the Soviet factor, relegating it to sideshow status. A series of counterfactual hypotheses can help clarify the question of which factor, the atomic bombs or Soviet entry into the war, had the more decisive effect on Japan's decision to surrender. We might ask, in particular, whether Japan would have surrendered before November 1, the scheduled date for the start of Operation Olympic, the U.S. invasion of Kyushu, given neither the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki nor Soviet entry into the war; Soviet entry alone, without the atomic bombings; or the atomic bombings alone, without Soviet entry.

Related questions

What is the legal document that explains the legal reasoning behind a Supreme Court decision is called?

A majority opinion is the legal document that explains the legal reasoning behind a Supreme Court decision.


The legal document that explains the legal reasoning behind a Supreme Court decision is called?

A majority opinion is the legal document that explains the legal reasoning behind a Supreme Court decision.


What is a detailed explanation of the legal thinking behind a court decision?

The written legal reasoning behind a court's decision is called an opinion.


What does an appellate judge issue if he or she agrees with the appellate court's decision but not its reasoning?

The judge issues a concurring opinion if he or she agrees with the result but not with the reasoning behind the result.


What has the author Dimitris Kyparissis written?

Dimitris Kyparissis has written: 'An investigation into the reasoning behind the dividend decision'


What are unsigned opinions which outline the reasoning behind a nearly unanimous Supreme Court decision known as ?

a per curiam opinion


How do you use the word inexplicable in a sentence?

For some inexplicable reason, he's decided to cancel the project. The reasoning behind his decision was inexplicable.


What was the reasoning behind the Supreme Court's decision in Marbury v Madison?

Does the supreme court have the power to invalidate an act of congress because it violates the constitution.


A state or federal appellate courts published opinion is know as?

This is known as written opinion (the legal reasoning behind a decision). It is written from the senior justice involved in the majority (so it is also the majority opinion). Others may write concurring opinions to support a decision for different reasoning, and dissenting opinions are written if some people are against the decision.


What is a disposition narrative?

A disposition narrative is a written report or document that outlines the final decision made by a judge or court in a legal case. It summarizes the details of the case, the evidence presented, and the reasoning behind the judge's decision.


The reasoning behind a crime is referred to as the?

The MOTIVE.


What is the reasoning behind a production video?

The reasoning behind a production video is to market and advertise the product to the consumer. This is a very effective way to reach possible clients.