The USA hoped to end the war with Japan sooner, rather than the wearying business of capturing more and more islands at great cost to the manpower of the American armed forces. And indeed that's what happened, Japan surrendered a few days after the second A-bomb was dropped on Nagasaki.
If I disagree with a decision, I first take a moment to understand the reasoning behind it. Then, I calmly express my concerns, providing constructive feedback and alternative perspectives. It's important to listen to others’ viewpoints and engage in an open dialogue to seek common ground. Ultimately, if the decision stands, I commit to supporting it and focusing on the team's goals.
referring to the battle of gettysburg in 1863?
See website: Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki
Events leading up to a conclusion typically include a series of actions, decisions, or developments that build upon one another. These can involve the introduction of a problem or scenario, the gathering of relevant information, and the analysis of options or outcomes. As these events unfold, they create context and groundwork that inform the final decision or conclusion. Ultimately, they help to clarify the reasoning and rationale behind the conclusion reached.
The Constitution offered a framework for establishing the new government, and the Federalist Papers explained the reasoning behind the Constitution.
A majority opinion is the legal document that explains the legal reasoning behind a Supreme Court decision.
A majority opinion is the legal document that explains the legal reasoning behind a Supreme Court decision.
The written legal reasoning behind a court's decision is called an opinion.
The judge issues a concurring opinion if he or she agrees with the result but not with the reasoning behind the result.
Dimitris Kyparissis has written: 'An investigation into the reasoning behind the dividend decision'
The reasoning of the court refers to the rationale behind a court's decision in a legal case. It involves the application of relevant laws, rules, precedents, and facts to reach a conclusion or judgment. The court's reasoning is typically outlined in a written opinion that explains the legal basis for the decision.
She tried to justify her actions by explaining the reasoning behind her decision.
When all the justices agree on a decision and the reasoning behind it, it is called a "unanimous decision." In this case, the court's opinion reflects a single, cohesive stance on the issue at hand, with no dissenting opinions. Unanimous decisions often carry significant weight in legal precedents, as they demonstrate a clear consensus among the justices.
a per curiam opinion
The logic and reason behind my decision-making process involves gathering information, analyzing options, considering consequences, and choosing the best course of action based on facts and reasoning.
The author's line of reasoning behind the protagonist's decision to confront the antagonist in the climax of the story is to resolve the conflict and achieve closure. The protagonist's confrontation with the antagonist is a crucial moment that drives the plot forward and allows for the resolution of the story's central conflict.
Rationale in decision-making refers to the underlying reasons or justifications for a decision, while logic involves the systematic and coherent reasoning used to arrive at a decision. Rationale focuses on the why behind a decision, while logic focuses on the how.