answersLogoWhite

0

The institution of slavery. For prposes of apportionment of taxes and seats in the U.S. House of Representatives, each slave was to count as less than a full person.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about General History
Related Questions

What did the threefifths compromise do?

allowed the slave states to count a slave as three-fifths of a person


The ThreeFifths Compromise determined how population would be counted for?

The Three-Fifths Compromise determined how population would be counted for....? Representation in Congress and also direct taxes on the population of the states.


The great compromise or Connecticut compromise was in response to the proposal by roger sherman what is the great compromise?

the great compromise was when Virgina wanted states to have equal power and new jersey wanted states power to be based on population so they created the house and the senate as a compromise one equal one based on population.


Can the application of a utilitarian approach to ethics lead an unjust response or the compromise of someone's rights?

Yes


Which group was most appeased by this provision in the compromise?

To provide an accurate answer, I need more context about the specific compromise you are referring to. However, in many historical compromises, such as the Missouri Compromise or the Compromise of 1850, it is often the case that pro-slavery factions or Southern states were appeased by provisions that allowed for the expansion of slavery or the return of escaped slaves. Please specify the compromise for a more precise response.


The aim of successful speechmaking is to gain a desired response from listeners even if the speaker must compromise his or her beliefs to do so?

true


Is the aim of successful speechmaking is to gain a desired response from listeners even if the speaker must compromise his or her beliefs to do so?

true


Who helped negotiate both the Compromise of 1820 and the Compromise of 1850?

Henry Clay and President Andrew Jackson were the main players in the compromise of 1833. The compromise was in response to conflicts between the federal government and South Carolina over taxes.


What was Saul's response to the compromise to be servants of the ammonites?

Saul's response to the compromise of becoming servants to the Ammonites was one of strong disapproval and indignation. He rallied the Israelites to fight against the Ammonites, demonstrating his commitment to protecting the dignity and freedom of his people. This action helped solidify his leadership and unite the Israelites under his command, ultimately leading to a decisive victory against the Ammonites. Saul's response illustrated his dedication to the welfare of Israel and his rejection of subjugation.


What is the meaning of inflammation or vascular compromise?

inflammation represents the body's response to tissue injury caused by pressure , friction , repeated load or overload and external trauma


What compromise lead to the civil war?

the Missouri compromise, the 3/5 compromise, and the compromise of 1850 no it was thethe Missouri compromise, the 3/5 compromise, and the compromise of 1850


How can a leader response to an issue result in political conflict or compromise?

A leader's response to an issue can lead to political conflict if their stance alienates certain groups or interests, provoking strong opposition and deepening divisions. Conversely, a leader who seeks compromise may facilitate dialogue, fostering collaboration and mitigating tensions among differing factions. The effectiveness of their response often hinges on their ability to balance interests, communicate transparently, and engage stakeholders, which can either escalate conflict or pave the way for productive solutions. Ultimately, the leader's approach can shape the political landscape and influence the broader societal response to the issue at hand.